What drives this denial of reality towards fantasy societies is bad traumatic education. I assume, China has compulsory forced education in rural districts. Bad long hours of childhood education continued mental stress, self-conditioned to medicate mental stress with fantasy beliefs on how smart brains feel they are. Humans become very sensitive to hearing and or reading fearful murderous information, favouring angry in denial and or not understanding, not knowing angry responses. How education conditions this behaviour is by forcing long hours of mental stress while students are attempting to (pretend think) learn stressful to understand information. Media news murder stories forcing little more than loathing judgements toward murderers. People don't want to realise and or worry that society leaders are intentionally planning some future war, disrupting future plans, killing off citizens and delaying baby births.

As past wars' media reminders show how wars are terrible events, any ideas of wars being planned conspiracies, distractions from educated people's traumatic education thinking traumas medicating controls. Educated people's sensitive to fear emotions programmed students to pull away from fears. Students having no control of forced education, educated people don't want to realise wars as planned into societies.

Education also conditions students to scan memories for learnt information. If information has no remembered single answers found within a 3 second primary school teacher question to be answered within that 3 second conditioned period. Mental stress increases, punishing scanning brains needs for smartness medication, towards self-conditioned denial, escaping fear of not knowing.

Education conditions most successful students to keep themselves busy. Residual mental stress (traumas) can be distracted from and medicated by physical hyperactivity, ADHD. The same people repressing any thought with pulling away from thought towards some planned tasks needed to be immediately done. These same hyperactive people can make poor shallow minded choices. The choice of not wanting to hear information that opposes simple fantasy beliefs, is often practised.

November 1, 2015. television station TCN, late night 10.40 PM one hour “The Verdict” program, short discussion on education. One women was suggesting that education doesn't work with all students. Parents too busy, don't have the inclination to teach their children how to read. Students fail at the end of education, feel like idiots, go on drugs. “The Institute of Family Studies” state year 10 year 11 and year 12 aren't the problem. Studies recommend early intervention, creating early learning pathways. Teachers not providing, need to provide individual children with specified learning to solve student individual deficiency difficulties.
Other guest speakers blaming a lack of money, that teachers should be paid twice to three times more money to fix students educational problems.
The Verdict program is a late Sunday night, most people with children are in bed, getting ready for the next days working Monday.

What The Verdict program didn't mention: hurrying; changing curriculum subjects every 40 and or 60 minutes. Not being able to learn a complete subject before moving on to another subject; 6 hour school days increasing memory repressing mental stress.

My accusations are that government education is a working class education, designed to provide zombie robot truck driver skills, brains repressing complex thought. The few students that succeed in education are left with zombie robot form filling out employment tasks.
University educated: Lawyers; architects; GP doctors and other medical professionals are merely learning programmed procedures with incentives of earning increased monetary incomes. What allows humans to feel human are in most instances, family and friendly people relationships feel good simple daydreaming distractions.

In most instances all school educational learning will not be used therefore forgotten as adults age. Education was primarily used to stop useful information and experiencing useful individual thinking practices from being experienced, reused and proficiently learnt into human behaviours.
It is easy to lie to zombies than to get away with lying to thinking human brains.

Ruling classes can steal peoples wealth, people not being aware they're wealth is being stolen. That people being aware their wealth was stolen find whistle-blowing futile as badly educated people, not wanting to know out of fear of prolonged traumatising thought. Felt as worrying increasing slipping into depression.

Than there is always people who have pride in knowing everything they know to be true.

I pose arguments that news stories are not as realistic as stated. That news items are over the top faked fantasy stories of advanced science that in all truthful understanding, needs to be exposed.

Yet there exists in most people's needs to believe what they already believe in. My next reading for most people is difficult to except as true. Yet, as many people want to believe, fear of excepting, that they may have been believing something that is not true, fear of being wrong, being fooled. I ask you the reader to read the following readings as to at least understand plausible ideas to why no person has walked on the moon's surface.

Apollo Moon Landings Hoax Theories.

Here are my technical arguments for why no man has walked on the moon:
Having watched the Tom Hanks 1995 movie, “Apollo 13”. During the movie, electrical power on both modules were turned off. Atmosphere in the Apollo 13 modules was becoming colder. Actors could be seen in a state of freezing cold climate. Because modules are in an outer space vacuum, very little heat should have escaped from inside the Apollo 13 modules.
An argument is, the Sun's 100% time factor Sun's radiation would be heating up Apollo modules. Apollo landing modules are reported to be no more than 2 layers of thin metal. Eight day journeys to and from the moon would have many problems cooling Apollo modules. Transferring heat from Apollo modules into a vacuum of space would be difficult, I can't believe travelling to the moon using described technology was possible.

Further confirming ideas are: After Apollo missions ended, NASA Space Lab was deployed. Space Lab was exposed to around 60% direct Sun light radiation while orbiting earth, heating up to 130F... seen at the end of “When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions. (2008)” documentary. Exposes NASA's unknown experiences with Sun radiation.

An Internet search reports the moon's estimated surface temperature during direct Sun light on moon's surface periods is 124C/253F. Space suits would heat up while walking on the moon's surface. Apollo moon landings walking on the moon surface often lasted 2 hours. One moon landing had a buggy assembled on the moon, resulting in a stated 2 hour buggy ride.

Direct Sun light radiation problems are not a media conversation. I believe such conversations would expose moon landing hoaxes. The fact that the Apollo 13 movie drama points out Apollo modules conflicting temperature realities, allows me to think the Apollo 13 movie wants people who can think to realise, Apollo missions are hoaxes. Media knowing that people who can realise Apollo missions are faked, by exposing Apollo hoax arguments to other people, exposes an inability for many people to except 1995 movie Apollo 13 information's corrections.

An account of the Apollo 11 and other landing modules during a television documentary “When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions. (2008)” has many dramatised hints that question Apollo moon landings. Video images of landing modules docking procedures, have no images of the landing module's rocket's exhausts. Images of the landing module moving away from the orbiting module, the orbiting module said to be travelling at 3000 miles per hour at 60 miles above the moon surface, landing modules need to slow down to moon's one month rotation speed to land are not shown.
Landing modules taking off from the moon, need to speed up to 3000 miles an hour in a zero atmosphere vacuum to catch up to orbiting modules in order to dock. Landing modules take off from the moon by suddenly exploding off landing module's stand, stand(s) containing the rocket used to land landing modules on the moon. The difficulty in landing modules speeding up to 3000 miles an hour, 60 miles above the moon surface, with a moon gravity of one sixth that of earth, using 1960s technology, are very... very... very... questionable.

Space vehicle rockets taking off from earth are long and thin. Example theory is: by balancing a broom handle at one end, allows a long structure to be easily balanced. As the top part of the broom handle falls, the top of the broom handle takes a significant amount of time to fall over, allowing time to force the bottom end of the broom handle towards the direction the broom handle is falling. Balancing a small box on a finger is difficult, almost impossible. Landing modules with the rocket engines pushing from the bottom, even though the moon is one sixth the earth's gravity, allows landing modules to be difficult to land on the moon. A supporting argument is that earth's four NASA experimental landing modules (seen on the 2008 documentary) all failed, crashing to earth. No tests on a no atmosphere moon had been carried out.