October 26, 2015. 4 Corners program on Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and other US whistleblowers.
One week earlier, Monday night, October 19, 4 Corner program, Union officials and arbitrators counter accused by unions of corrupt wrong doing.

Starting a discussion on whether democratic governed societies need independent from government and commercially financed media whistleblowers to keep governments honest?

On October 26, 2015. 4 Corners ran a story on “Whistleblowers”. High lighting Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and several other US whistleblowers. Whistleblowers were exposing NSA (National Security Agency) invasion of US citizens privacy.

South Park's Cartman exposing NSA invasion of privacy, NSA using Santa Claws's ability to know who was naughty and who was good, ended in Cartman crying, stating to his mother, “no one cares”. Cartman's mother stating “no one cares, if government are breaking the law in order to keep US citizens safe”.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3A_VT9YGA10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYtk74kci_k

Whistleblowers don't fair well in media stories. My spin on whistleblower stories are to remind real whistleblowers not to expose government manipulating tricks. Jesus much published execution story is one parable story devoted to what happens to whistleblowers, threats.

At the end of the October 26, 4 Corners episode, a preview of next week's 4 Corners story, previewing a short scene of what looks to be an aged 7 year old female child suffering from ADHD, H for hyperactivity. The child's mother stating her drinking of alcohol during her pregnancy caused her child to suffer from poor learning abilities.
I am often posting on psychology forums, long detailed readings, blaming mental depression and a conditioned school student hatred of learning caused by at least 13 years of 6 hour days of bad education learning psycho punishing mental stress. In my posts I detail how forced hurrying tactics; narrow minded, irrelevant to real life curriculum subjects, are meant to dumb down a working class (intelligent learning abilities) to truck driver level of skills. Because people are so repressive of complex and doubtful thinking, people don't want to believe they have been intentionally dummied. Educated school conditioning, conditions repressing fear of not knowing teachers questions embarrassments. Schools traumatise working class students into keeping themselves dumb up to students final adult death.

Government and commercial financed media stories blame: lack of money; bad parenting; going to school early; too many tests, yet nothing changes.
Now media are introducing mother's alcoholic abuses.

4 corners story on Indonesia importing live cattle, animal rights abuses. Julia Gillard banning live exports to Indonesia. Watching the few 4 Corners captured images of cattle being abused, an Indonesian looking person could be seen pulling on a rope from behind a barrier, the other end of the rope was tied to a cow's leg, for no apparent reason, other than to trip over the cow.

Future stories had Northern Territory cattle produces losing lots of income due to Gillard's live cattle export ban. Julia Gillard was rarely being accused of banning live cattle exports poor decision making. Instead of Julia Gillard banning live cattle exports, a correct decision would have had a committee sent to Indonesia, asking live cattle processing to be fixed.

To me, I could only see such poor decisions as no more than intentionally crashing Northern Territory live cattle exporting businesses. Seems obvious to me, by showing limited images, 4 Corners was inventing the story, providing enough evidence for two separate conclusions: one conclusion being, a story that is believed because the media said the story was real and another conclusion from people who don't believe what they're told, using a 4 Corners visual image that shows doubt in the story to attract people to doubt the story to be true and Julia Gillard's bad banning live cattle exporting decision, for reasons governments to be seen as unrealistic (badly educated common truck drivers) emotional decision makers. In order to grab the attention of intelligent people for future confidence trickery, “we know you know too much so we won't mess you around”. Government fear of creating more whistleblowers.

Hence why there are whistleblower threatening media stories reminders.

I would state 2007, 2008 Global Financial Crises was an invented media story, blaming market forces for stealing investors savings. Very few people went to jail. That the only reason working class workers are encouraged to save for retirement, is to prevent savers from spending their money. Inflation and occasional market declines removing accumulated savings. Governments and share market traded companies care more about paper asset investments than selling products companies make. Much of what's advertised on television and letter box drops are very expensive to buy, have on going charges and or few people care to purchase advertised products. Television advertising M&Ms, and other confection fattening products.

Democratic government politicians after 2008 were consumed with blaming sub-prime mortgage products, bundled up as securities, too complex to explain to average working class workers. Politicians often reminders were reduced down to The GFC.

Capitalist federal banking system rescuing market economies from collapse with invented money, given to banks to prop up bank reserves, money eventually said to be invested in share markets. Hundreds of US banks declared bankrupt, each bank saver given US$250 compensation.

General Motors declaring bankruptcy. Worker unions renegotiating GM worker retirement entitlements, GM obligations to half of what was previously contracted to workers, on the idea that General Motors invested workers retirement funds in Sub-prime bundled mortgages. Years later after property prices have risen, have sub-prime mortgage securities increased in value?

After 2008, Because fewer people were buying US General Motors vehicles, I assume Toyota vehicles became the next best choice, increasing demands on Toyota vehicle production, Toyota couldn't provide. Suddenly, Toyota is said to have sticky accelerator problems, recalling Toyota motor vehicle embarrassments, scaring future customers into delaying purchasing Toyota motor vehicles. One more opportunity for embarrassing transparency media stories promoting democracy government free media transparency is a great system.

Many journalist reporters can create stories while a limited number of publishing editors approving publication of stories exist. Regulating story themes away from realistic conspiracy assumptions. Journalists reporting stories of on the spot actual words said to be coming out of important people's mouths.

Lazy thinking people (I say are conditioned by schooling education) believe such involved above mentioned conspiracies can't be true. Too many people would be involved to make conspiracies work.
My easy argument is: A pope and all religious priests, actually communicating to a magical god, is realistic? “surely” that's an organised conspiracy. Shows how stupid people are. Bad education causing mental illness side effects, another conspiracy?

Aged 5 year old children will almost believe anything they're told. By merely holding humans at a 5 year old intelligence ability, using mental stress repressing thinking traumas, seems the next stage of intelligent programming.

I blame working class education for programming workers to believe everything media tells workers. Everyone having the same education, allowing everyone the same inability to doubt what they were told to believe while they were children. A media reinforcing same beliefs with media stories allowing old judgements to be reinforced.

The fear in not believing what is believed is like taking religious believers and convincing religious believers “a magical miracle making god doesn't exist”. People can be so stupid to what they already believed as children, being traumatised while being educated at school should be a believable idea. Yet as very few people aren't working class educated, few people can understand what educating children starting aged 5 and 6 years can do to children's future thinking abilities.

The best and easiest conspiracies exposer to explain, is by first exposing schooling education's persuasive programming influences, as to express why many people can't believe in realistic conspiracies, allowing market forces to work as ruling classes desire. It is as saying, “market forces economy, governed by democracy governments, watched over by transparency exposing free media, are too good to be true”.

Is “We are all Keynesians now” coming and or here?

Readers who aren't old enough to know what happened during the 1970s and 1980s: After 1960s low inflation, long period of fixed mortgage interest rates. During the 1970s and 1980s, western economies suffered from high 10% inflation.
This reading is about how John Maynard Keynes is capitalism's “Christian religion version of the devil” comparison. Unclear economic arguments about Keynesian economics are worth while to know.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_are_all_Keynesians_now

What vague readings don't tell readers about capitalism are that capitalist economy expansion periods financed by share market booms, share market traded companies borrow money based on company share valuations. Following busts margin calls, sends share market companies into bankruptcy theory and or ends further expansion, 1930s rising unemployment example.

Keynesian economics recommends governments invent money, creating government projects to create employment, creating money circulation, increasing tax revenue to pay for the initial government money creation. During 1930s, Keynesian economics was ignored. President Roosevelt reported to have used Keynesian economics to pay for the Second World War. After the Second World War ended, no further depression existed.

Once curios readers understand Keynesian economics, Richard Nixon's “we are all Keynesians now” statement... knowledgeable Keynesian readers would realise a capitalist expansion had finished, that share markets “were not” going to crash, as 1929 Wall Street and world share Market crashed. My memory of Nixon's 1971 statement had 1970s and 1980s inflation eroding savings, already in progress.

During early 1999, around March, I remember John Howard stating on television very much like, “we're not doing Keynesian this time”, definitely remembering John Howard stating something like “we're not putting up log fences in parks this time as was done in the 70s”.
By June 1999, a Radio National Life Matters quest speaker comments clearly suggested 'world banks were crashing during this third quarter market decline', yet didn't. Setting up people who understood Keynesian theory, eventually fell into a confidence scam. People taking money out of banks, having money stolen.

DOW Jones index: 11,400, on July 1999; index down to 7,200 on October 30, 1999; index back up to 11,700 on around January 4, 2000. In 64 days a 4,500 index point increase, was truly amazing.

I assume Tony Abbott's Statement, “I want to be known as the infrastructure prime minister” means to people who have remembered past Keynesian announcements, Keynes is back.

U.S. Federal Banking Reserve (fed) was created in 1913, after a period of declining U.S. economic banking problems. The U.S. fed was created to invent money in order to stimulate a depressed U.S. economy. Having read that after the 1929 crash, the U.S. fed failed to do what the fed was created to do, create money.

Myself having read economic books, I read how the fed creates money out of nothing, then creates a bond to the same value. Selling the bond in the bond market. The practice of inventing bonds to sell on the bond market stops too much money supply and too much demand on goods monetary inflation. Supply and demand theory.

When President George W Bush left office, the U.S. national debt was US$10 trillion. Last I heard U.S. national debt was US$18 trillion.

https://www.google.com.au/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=us+national+debt&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=HfQxVpCOO6Pu8wfxjIfAAg

U.S. Congress sets a date for passing a bill to invent more money. Congress is reported to be concerned about the national debt. Shutting down government departments scary stories up to a last moment, passing a bill to invent money.

2007 and 2008 sub-prime mortgage “banking” crises had banks being short of funds. As I heard: the fed gives invented money to banks at zero interest. Banks used fed's invented money to buy the invented bonds from the fed collecting 1.5% interest.
Years before Ben Bernanke stepped down as fed governor, it was reported the fed was buying back bonds from banks at a cost rate of US$85 billion each month. Giving banks cash to lend to borrowers.

The big scary U.S. national US$18 trillion debt is mostly credited to the U.S. federal government. One more transparency, bad government, capitalism doesn't work, confidence trick exposure transparency. Screwing around with people's sense of whose in control of uncontrolled economic chaos.

Once bonds are sold to banks and financial institutions, returning back the money to the fed the money the fed invented, to, I assume to pay for what? If wage earners save left over money after essential expenses, saving money in financial institutions' 401K accounts. Some moneys gets Invested in U.S. Bonds, taking money out of personal spending circulation.

What the U.S. fed is doing is not Keynesian economics. Even when Keynesian economics is said to be used. Encouraging saving money for retirement is not in Keynesian economics.

…..........................

The Watergate phrase “follow the money” has banks accumulating savings credits, yet, as money is lent, bank cheques circulate. Cashed in bank cheques credits, returning to bank customer accounts, increasing bank balance sheets credits.
The more money banks lend the more banks accumulate new credits in new and existing accounts paying out depositors interest liabilities.

When thought about, banks don't suffer from a lack of lending capital and or cash reserves. Banks suffer from too much interest paying liabilities from customer depositors accumulated credits. When banks financial advisers advise customers to buy shares aided by using borrowed money, eventually shares being lost. Banks' bad financial adviser advise scandals offset ideas that banks are keen to remove future depositors credits from returning to customer bank accounts.

Many Australians born after 1918 WW1 end, generation, having gone through the 1930s depression, had experienced high inflation in 1952-53. Many workers in the 1960s considering retirement, were encouraged to place they're savings in investment companies. Many people ready for retirement in the 1980s had been told in the early 1980s, their investment money was gone. Resulting media statements labelled “the bottom of the harbour scheme” scam has taken the money. What allows people to merely except media excuses are the confidence in the political system, and years of media transparency.
The correct Bottom Of the Harbour transparency would have been: where did the money go as to the money being returned to the rightful owners.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bottom_of_the_harbour_tax_avoidance
Particularly read: Deputy Crown Solicitor debacle

If readers believe what they read as true, it is easy to believe tax authorities are incompetent, rather than think “tax authorities are in on the scheme scam”, relieving Australian citizen of their savings. Not that tax authorities receive money, more as retiring citizens never get to spend retirement savings.

….................................

Tony Abbott's comment about being wanted to be known as the infrastructure prime minister, suggesting Keynesian theory economics. There are lots of public works being done around where I live, at the moment: foot paths; road edging; car parking areas.

My Gawd Steve101 what a rant !
You asked somewhere in all that had the mortgages regained their value ?

Well no they have not.
Many houses were abandoned and stripped by vandals, even down to the copper pipes.
The big problem they have is that it is such a mess that they do not
know who holds the mortgages.
They have tens of thousands of court cases going on tyring to sort it out.
In Florida brought in retired judges to operate a court in a rented
shop front and hired hundreds of people to sit there signing documents
in an attempt to make it appear that it has been resolved.
Thousands of people are living in houses and paying no mortgage or
other payments because they do not have title and it is not known
who does hold the title.
Many mortgage brokers went broke and disappeared and much information
is living in laptops in somebodies cupboards.
Banks went broke and did not tidy up their affairs and just locked
the doors and went away.
There appears to be no way to resolve who owns what and it will cost
more to find out, even if traceable, than the property is worth.

The problem will not be resolved. The people living in the house can
stay until they die and I presume the property will pass to the state.
Of course they could just hand the keys to anyone else to move in.

China's one child policy was said by TEN news, on October 30, 'about 400 million children have been prevented from being born since the one child policy was introduced in 1979'.
That evening's ABC1 news said 'China's Communist Party one child policy introduced in the 1970s to rain in a China's population to 700 million people', due to exemptions, now China has twice the population.

The Communist Party's new two child policy introduced to solve demographic imbalance: too few workers to too many elderly retired citizens, problems.

In that 36 year period one child family policy, considering the next generation being born, not having that 400 million fewer births number would amount to 600 to 700 million more Chinese people. Have that 600 to 700 million have the usual number of children growing into adulthood having children, number of humans can only increase.
I pose the problem exists with the elderly, not the need to decrease child births, is the demographic problem. As every poorly educated' traumatised to keep themselves ignorant humans, wants to live in a fantasy world, for the sake of self-deception, not wanting worry fears, unable to think. Politicians are seen to comply with the fantasy of common working class Chinese (living a long life) poorly thought out working class desires.

To add to the fantasy:
Why not have the First World War 20 million not dying, having children and the Second World War 55 million not dying, having children. Both war dead not having died, having children generation after generation. Without modern chemical fertilisers, this above concept would be more relevant.

This unrealistic notion of how life is, prompted realism of life seems to be ignored by people who only want to feel good about life as they are as humans want life to be about. Such people believe in the sanctity of life. Any people, religious or political speaking on the sanctity of human life, becomes the (catholic ideology) religion and or political party of preferred choice.

What drives this denial of reality towards fantasy societies is bad traumatic education. I assume, China has compulsory forced education in rural districts. Bad long hours of childhood education continued mental stress, self-conditioned to medicate mental stress with fantasy beliefs on how smart brains feel they are. Humans become very sensitive to hearing and or reading fearful murderous information, favouring angry in denial and or not understanding, not knowing angry responses. How education conditions this behaviour is by forcing long hours of mental stress while students are attempting to (pretend think) learn stressful to understand information. Media news murder stories forcing little more than loathing judgements toward murderers. People don't want to realise and or worry that society leaders are intentionally planning some future war, disrupting future plans, killing off citizens and delaying baby births.

As past wars' media reminders show how wars are terrible events, any ideas of wars being planned conspiracies, distractions from educated people's traumatic education thinking traumas medicating controls. Educated people's sensitive to fear emotions programmed students to pull away from fears. Students having no control of forced education, educated people don't want to realise wars as planned into societies.

Education also conditions students to scan memories for learnt information. If information has no remembered single answers found within a 3 second primary school teacher question to be answered within that 3 second conditioned period. Mental stress increases, punishing scanning brains needs for smartness medication, towards self-conditioned denial, escaping fear of not knowing.

Education conditions most successful students to keep themselves busy. Residual mental stress (traumas) can be distracted from and medicated by physical hyperactivity, ADHD. The same people repressing any thought with pulling away from thought towards some planned tasks needed to be immediately done. These same hyperactive people can make poor shallow minded choices. The choice of not wanting to hear information that opposes simple fantasy beliefs, is often practised.

November 1, 2015. television station TCN, late night 10.40 PM one hour “The Verdict” program, short discussion on education. One women was suggesting that education doesn't work with all students. Parents too busy, don't have the inclination to teach their children how to read. Students fail at the end of education, feel like idiots, go on drugs. “The Institute of Family Studies” state year 10 year 11 and year 12 aren't the problem. Studies recommend early intervention, creating early learning pathways. Teachers not providing, need to provide individual children with specified learning to solve student individual deficiency difficulties.
Other guest speakers blaming a lack of money, that teachers should be paid twice to three times more money to fix students educational problems.
The Verdict program is a late Sunday night, most people with children are in bed, getting ready for the next days working Monday.

What The Verdict program didn't mention: hurrying; changing curriculum subjects every 40 and or 60 minutes. Not being able to learn a complete subject before moving on to another subject; 6 hour school days increasing memory repressing mental stress.

My accusations are that government education is a working class education, designed to provide zombie robot truck driver skills, brains repressing complex thought. The few students that succeed in education are left with zombie robot form filling out employment tasks.
University educated: Lawyers; architects; GP doctors and other medical professionals are merely learning programmed procedures with incentives of earning increased monetary incomes. What allows humans to feel human are in most instances, family and friendly people relationships feel good simple daydreaming distractions.

In most instances all school educational learning will not be used therefore forgotten as adults age. Education was primarily used to stop useful information and experiencing useful individual thinking practices from being experienced, reused and proficiently learnt into human behaviours.
It is easy to lie to zombies than to get away with lying to thinking human brains.

Ruling classes can steal peoples wealth, people not being aware they're wealth is being stolen. That people being aware their wealth was stolen find whistle-blowing futile as badly educated people, not wanting to know out of fear of prolonged traumatising thought. Felt as worrying increasing slipping into depression.

Than there is always people who have pride in knowing everything they know to be true.

I pose arguments that news stories are not as realistic as stated. That news items are over the top faked fantasy stories of advanced science that in all truthful understanding, needs to be exposed.

Yet there exists in most people's needs to believe what they already believe in. My next reading for most people is difficult to except as true. Yet, as many people want to believe, fear of excepting, that they may have been believing something that is not true, fear of being wrong, being fooled. I ask you the reader to read the following readings as to at least understand plausible ideas to why no person has walked on the moon's surface.

Apollo Moon Landings Hoax Theories.

Here are my technical arguments for why no man has walked on the moon:
Having watched the Tom Hanks 1995 movie, “Apollo 13”. During the movie, electrical power on both modules were turned off. Atmosphere in the Apollo 13 modules was becoming colder. Actors could be seen in a state of freezing cold climate. Because modules are in an outer space vacuum, very little heat should have escaped from inside the Apollo 13 modules.
An argument is, the Sun's 100% time factor Sun's radiation would be heating up Apollo modules. Apollo landing modules are reported to be no more than 2 layers of thin metal. Eight day journeys to and from the moon would have many problems cooling Apollo modules. Transferring heat from Apollo modules into a vacuum of space would be difficult, I can't believe travelling to the moon using described technology was possible.

Further confirming ideas are: After Apollo missions ended, NASA Space Lab was deployed. Space Lab was exposed to around 60% direct Sun light radiation while orbiting earth, heating up to 130F... seen at the end of “When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions. (2008)” documentary. Exposes NASA's unknown experiences with Sun radiation.

An Internet search reports the moon's estimated surface temperature during direct Sun light on moon's surface periods is 124C/253F. Space suits would heat up while walking on the moon's surface. Apollo moon landings walking on the moon surface often lasted 2 hours. One moon landing had a buggy assembled on the moon, resulting in a stated 2 hour buggy ride.

Direct Sun light radiation problems are not a media conversation. I believe such conversations would expose moon landing hoaxes. The fact that the Apollo 13 movie drama points out Apollo modules conflicting temperature realities, allows me to think the Apollo 13 movie wants people who can think to realise, Apollo missions are hoaxes. Media knowing that people who can realise Apollo missions are faked, by exposing Apollo hoax arguments to other people, exposes an inability for many people to except 1995 movie Apollo 13 information's corrections.

An account of the Apollo 11 and other landing modules during a television documentary “When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions. (2008)” has many dramatised hints that question Apollo moon landings. Video images of landing modules docking procedures, have no images of the landing module's rocket's exhausts. Images of the landing module moving away from the orbiting module, the orbiting module said to be travelling at 3000 miles per hour at 60 miles above the moon surface, landing modules need to slow down to moon's one month rotation speed to land are not shown.
Landing modules taking off from the moon, need to speed up to 3000 miles an hour in a zero atmosphere vacuum to catch up to orbiting modules in order to dock. Landing modules take off from the moon by suddenly exploding off landing module's stand, stand(s) containing the rocket used to land landing modules on the moon. The difficulty in landing modules speeding up to 3000 miles an hour, 60 miles above the moon surface, with a moon gravity of one sixth that of earth, using 1960s technology, are very... very... very... questionable.

Space vehicle rockets taking off from earth are long and thin. Example theory is: by balancing a broom handle at one end, allows a long structure to be easily balanced. As the top part of the broom handle falls, the top of the broom handle takes a significant amount of time to fall over, allowing time to force the bottom end of the broom handle towards the direction the broom handle is falling. Balancing a small box on a finger is difficult, almost impossible. Landing modules with the rocket engines pushing from the bottom, even though the moon is one sixth the earth's gravity, allows landing modules to be difficult to land on the moon. A supporting argument is that earth's four NASA experimental landing modules (seen on the 2008 documentary) all failed, crashing to earth. No tests on a no atmosphere moon had been carried out.

Each time, all mission, both Apollo modules return to earth, journey from the moon had the orbiting module travelling to earth, reaching earth at stated 24,000 miles an hour, to be slowed down by the earth's atmosphere's friction. Orbiting modules splashing down exactly at the right place, to be seen close to aircraft carriers. Earth's rotation is around 1000 kilometres an hour. A one minute mistake in a splash down time and the distance from an aircraft carrier would be many kilometres away.

NASA Space Shuttle orbiting earth, travels at 14,700 miles per hour, needing special heat resisting tiles technology to re-enter earth's atmosphere, landing on earth's surface. Apollo orbiting modules reportedly entered earth's atmosphere at 24,000 miles an hour. Heat friction difference for unproven Apollo journeys must be questionable.

Arjay, you can now retire, someone has surpassed you in conspiracy theories !

In my posts I detail how forced hurrying tactics; narrow minded, irrelevant to real life curriculum subjects, are meant to dumb down a working class (intelligent learning abilities) to truck driver level of skills. Because people are so repressive of complex and doubtful thinking, people don't want to believe they have been intentionally dummied.

Media information that many people believe moon landings were hoaxes maybe true. People with engineering knowledge and thinking ability I believe will agree with the above ideas. Media suggestions that photos of men walking on the moon, photo shadows being in the wrong place, said by the media as reasons for sceptics, proven to be false analogies, are not realistic reinforcing evidence that men actually walked on the moon. More of a reminding prompting reinforcement judgement that no person has walked on the moon is incorrect.

If there were reasons for moon landing distractions, I'd say a distraction from the Vietnam War, and that populations support governments that provide successful scientific advancement, providing USA citizenry pride to be a US citizen. Politicians receive increased populous support for the Vietnam War.

By now, having mentioned no moon landings happened, most readers feel I must be crazy not to believe that men have walked on the moon, feeling good about themselves, because they believe that men have walked on the moon.

Three elderly adult men, I've shared my theories with have displayed their disappointment and disbelief in the hoax analogy, referring me to a NASA website, to view more photos of the Apollo landings. Myself, finding being referred to more faked pictures, humorous.

Below is my accusations against education's long hours of mental stress conditioning that few people having gone through education, not only don't care to believe, absolutely psychologically repress in believing:
To an emotional decision making person, NO amount of evidence and or engineering technical arguments will change beliefs. Self-imposed belief in they're own: judgemental system; a childhood conditioned induced emotional gratification for being smart; fear of getting it wrong, being wrong is enough to possibly trigger depression and or worsening depression, caused by education's years of repressed mental stress. Because children were fed information while children were under influences of childhood emotional decision making learning, the cause of the above example (few people will believe no person has walked on the moon) must be pointed at government curriculum certified education. Childhood emotional learning maybe ideal for physical movement animal behaviours. I don't believe emotional gratification self-rewarding for believing unproven, irrational information is recommended, particularly while under mental stress, needing gratification rewarding influences to self-medicate educational mental stress traumas.

My entire strategy is to convince readers that media and government are: limiting thinkable knowledge, (keeping citizens dumb); misinforming; entertaining; covering up bad education; reinforcing citizenry perceptions that governments are trying they're best, yet politicians are no more intelligent than average working class citizens; media, legal systems and government are separate from each other as a democratic system, media exposing scandals, transparency: citizens having faith in the political process.

Steve101,
Really, I would like to make a suggestion to you but I will not.

I had a friend whose job it was to make sure the maser amplifier at
the focus of the Parkes dish was operating at optimum gain.
He was at the site during the landing.

I suppose you will now tell me he was threatened with gaol if he
became a whistleblower.

Oh dear oh dear sigh.

Democracy may cease to exist
with whistleblowers like Snowden and Assange

They reveal state secrets and state counter terrorism methods at a time when
Our country and Allies are at war.

Different rules apply in a time of war.

These two would have no idea what it's like to live in
A real totalitarian state. I Think they would both wet themselves
Before having the guts to be whistleblowers in the states under Isis control

Snowden is probably trying to cover up all his pornagraphic activities
On line.
Because they can read my emails and whatever they like, I have nothing
To hide.

From my experiences communicating with school educated Australians. My assumptions are 95% of educated Australians feel they can think. School educated children and teenagers were stopped from experiencing thinking behaviours. Schooling education's years of pretend thinking churning curriculum studying, traumatised students' ability to want to think independent thoughts, instead students are programmed to believe what they're told to believe, students pursuing sports stimulated enthusiasm. What happens in sports is felt as brilliant. Sports is the level of intelligence, most school educated Australians inspire to.

I stated in the beginning of the Moon landing reading that few people want to believe “no person has walked on the moon”. With most people who feel they can think, no amount of technical arguments will be excepted that prompt alternative thought to whether humans walked on the moon. The feel good factor self-esteem feel good is true, feel bad is false analogy, fear of being wrong schooling's psychological programming. The bad feeling is wrong, stops people who feel they can think, from ever wanting to change their “no thinking intelligence” judgements.

Schoolings years of quick stimulated classroom conditioned to know a single answers to questions, judged correct, feel good is true educated students, traumatised into students memories, (don't make them think or they'll hate you for it). “Feel they can think” educated Australians are impossible to make think that what they believe true is not true.

I could pose many thinkable ideas that badly educated Australians will quickly reject as true, merely because of how they feel while being told and or reading information that prompts unaccustomed torturous thought, (real thinking). Fear of feeling classroom learning under classroom repressing torturous mental stress, continually being repressed. Feeling smart on escaping and or avoiding learning something new, aids instant judgements of wanting to believe what is already believed.

Can't re-educate the already ADHD and ADD badly educated.

I posed technical arguments to why no person has walked on the moon, replies only had anecdotal hearsay from a person who worked at Parks Dish.

Technical arguments can be passed from person to person and remain good. “I was there” passed person to person relies on the first person's credibility.

An inability to except conspiracies, even a possibility of conspiracies, is evidence of a conspiracy to badly educate children into believing everything populations are told to believe. The idea that refusing to understand technical theories to why no person landed and walked on the moon, aids my convictions that schooling education traumatised populations thinking abilities.

Many talk programs often bring up education, quoting solutions on how to fix school education system with increased money. Increasing money is often quoted, while governments are known to be short of money, is a ploy to stop parents complaints to why they're children are mentally stressed; depressed; confused; increased poor behaviours; acting dumb; smoking; wanting to take illegal drugs to medicate schooling traumas.

Take careful notice if you can:

http://www.9jumpin.com.au/show/the-verdict/videos/4585360158001/

My arguments: “Poor out comes” are intentional to traumatise learning behaviours, simplifying working class behaviours into manual skilled robot labours, machines can't perform. Believing everything state by a trusting media, to be true.

steve101,
The thing about the conspiracy theories about the moon landings never happening is that they all rely on demonstrably false assumptions.

I suggest you read http://www.spaceanswers.com/space-exploration/how-did-lunar-astronauts-survive-the-extreme-temperatures-on-the-moon/ to see the flaw of your own main objection.