Suzie, the war is still going on, what do you think has been happening
in France, it is war, it is just that it is now the new form of war.
Nuclear weapons have made the old style war a loss loss proposition.

This mass migration type of invasion is recommended in the Koran, the
Islamist even have a word for it Hijaz, I think is the correct spelling.
Europe has a growth problem and Germany will have a financial problem
with these numbers and the cost will put them into recession.

I notice that the Poles have said they will only accept Christians.
I suspect they have learnt the lesson of France, Netherlands and Belgium.

Rehctub, If those refugees and asylum seekers don't have the money for food, clothing or housing, how do you think they would afford to buy contraceptives, even if their religions allowed them to use them? Sex is one affordable comfort they may have left, and you would take even that from them?

Buzz, we know about the mass exodus from warring countries, but as far as I know, they aren't all Muslims. Even if they were, those people haven't declared war on Europe or Australia, regardless what a holy book says.

So what do you suggest Europe does?
Are you with Hasbeen in suggesting genocide?
Do you think shooting them all at the borders is a good idea?
How does that make us any better than terrorists?

Of course not Suzie and I do not think Hasbeen was advocating that.
Saying that he does sounds a bit like the technique that the left
applies to anything Abbott, Hockey and the others say and twist the
literal meaning of their words, ignoring the detail of what is said.
Yes I am accusing you of being a spinner, I think you must be giddy.

Looking at the crowds of immigrants on our nightly screens and that
the majority are young men under 50, what I would do would be with the
UN deport all those young men to Jordan where there are 4 million
refugees, add to the young men those in those camps and form them into
an army and send them to Syria to fix up their own mess.
If they are unable to fix their own problem, it is after all not our
problem, let them stew in it until it dawns on them that they have
to make peace with their neighbours.

At present they want the West to come in and fix it all up for them
and frankly there has been more than enough western blood spilt
doing that for them already.

Suze, having unprotected sex does not mean kids are born, it's the attitude that leads to conception, either that, or there are hundreds of thousands of accidents every year. Besides, surely the billions we provide in aid could see condoms being provided but once again the attitude of the men would no doubt see them go to waste.

Remind me again why we should be doing what ye can towards saving them!

Not sure of your age Suze, but I'm a new grandfather and I can assure you that my grand son will do without some of what I had just to look after Rudds invitees.

Hasbeen "They will have to start shooting soon, rather than rescuing, or Europe will disappear under a wave of useless humanity it can not support. "

Bazz, after reading this comment from Hasbeen, how else am I supposed to think?
What do you think he meant?

I believe the refugees from the awful warring places like Syria should be processed properly, given temporary visa's, and have them placed around Europe and beyond, so no one country is over-loaded. Once the conflict has settled, then they should be returned home.

We really can't blame the far from useless people from all sorts of countries from trying to reach a better, safer place for them and their families to live. Unless the rest of the world give plenty of assistance to improve the plight of the poorer people from those countries, then we can expect this migration catastrophe to get worse.

If We ignore the plight of these people, then we deserve what we get...

So Suze I note you have not yet answered the very simple question from hasbeen, that being how many families are you prepared to billet.

By billet that means you pay to keep them, not the tax payer.

Words are cheap and there is a huge difference between saying we should do something and actually doing something yourself.

I said a several years ago when Rudd created thus mess that we were being peacefully invaded and that we must either take out the big stick now, or wait until they come with guns.

Which is it to be?