The Forum > General Discussion > The age of entitlement is over. Apparently!
The age of entitlement is over. Apparently!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
On retirement, Bronwyn Bishop will receive a taxpayer funded pension of $255,000 for life, plus various perks and allowances, over and above whatever generous superannuation package has accrued for her, also at taxpayer expense.
Approximately $5 million per year in pensions is paid to ex-politicians annually. This includes any politician who has served for six years or more, including back-benchers.
A big chunk of this goes to ex-PMs, ex-Deputy PMs, ex-Opposition Leaders and ex-Deputy Opposition Leaders. John Howard, Paul Keating and all living ex-PMs elected prior to 2004 receive an average $250,000 pension for life, plus a city office, a staff of four, a chauffeur-driven car and unlimited business-class air travel. The perks alone cost up to $300,000 per politician per year. When they die, their spouses continue to receive a pension of $80,000 per year.
If the pollie was elected after 2004, they don’t get the chauffeur or the staff or four, but they get just about everything else.
If Kevin Rudd, say, lives to the age of 85, he will have cost the taxpayer about $15-20 million - for doing absolutely nothing.
As for superannuation, the annual cost to the taxpayer for the Parliamentary Superannuation Contribution Scheme now stands at $46 million, and increasing every year. (In 2013/2014, it was $39 million.)
Many of these politicians were already millionaires in their own right before entering parliament and/or rising to political prominence – Joe Hockey, Malcolm Turnbull, Peter Costello, Kevin Rudd and Paul Keating to name a few. What possible purpose does it serve to have these obscenely rich people suck the public purse long after they have left parliament, while eroding the rights of ordinary people to a minimum safety net when they fall on hard times?