The Forum > General Discussion > What does capital punishment actually achieve?
What does capital punishment actually achieve?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- ...
- 34
- 35
- 36
-
- All
Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 2 May 2015 10:47:16 PM
| |
back on topic
What does Capital Punishment actually achieve. Gets rid of scumbags out of the world for good Those 2 will never smuggle drugs again. success Probably be a few more thousands in our Jails atm maybe we could buy the Indonesians a few cases of bullets and and send a few plane loads of our problems to them. Rather then pretending this isnt happening Posted by Aussieboy, Sunday, 3 May 2015 10:31:20 AM
| |
Dear Aussieboy,
Actually capital punishment in Indonesia does not stop the drug trafficking trade. Attorney-General H.M. Prasetyo has stated that the number of drug users has risen to 4.5 million with 1.2 million of them beyond the point of rehabilitation because of the extreme natures of their cases. In other words, the death penalty for drug traffickers in Indonesia has done zilch to stem the spread of drugs into Indonesian communities. Ironically, Indonesia is well noted as a strong advocate against the death penalty for its citizens abroad. Attorney-General Prasetyo describes the tentacles of crime-syndicates spreading beyond major cities to rural areas - saying 45% of SE Asia's narcotics market is in Indonesia and those involved with these syndicates are Indonesia's police force and the military. Bribe-taking by police is endemic. Notorious night-spots where drug use is rife are also owned by prominent figures of the military and police. Drugs are easily available in their prisons (as we learned from the Corby experience) and the judiciary is also riddled with graft - which is an impenetrable barrier to convictions for drug barons. Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 3 May 2015 10:58:02 AM
| |
Foxy,
"In other words, the death penalty for drug traffickers in Indonesia has done zilch to stem the spread of drugs into Indonesian communities." How do you know? As I said earlier the drug problem in Indonesia could have been much worse without the death penalty. I wonder will the Australian Government now stop aid to Indonesia and thus shew them that we (as a nation) abhor their conduct and incidentally stop subsidizing their arms build up. Posted by Is Mise, Sunday, 3 May 2015 11:48:33 AM
| |
Foxy: Bribe-taking by police is endemic. Notorious night-spots where drug
use is rife are also owned by prominent figures of the military and police. Drugs are easily available in their prisons (as we learned from the Corby experience) and the judiciary is also riddled with graft - which is an impenetrable barrier to convictions for drug barons. Foxy this is Common Knowledge, Everybody knows this except our Government, or they do, they just pretend it's not happening. As they say, "Always was & always will be." Just where to you think our Aid money goes? Graft & bribery are not considered crimes in SE Asia. It's their way of doing Business. Unfortunately Australians can't get their heads around that because, for the most part, we are closeted. Regardless of weather Drug dealing is rife in SE Asia is no reason not to keep pursuing the matter. Indonesia has the death penalty, Everybody who goes there is informed of that fact. There are signs up everywhere. Do the Crime, do the time, Death Penalty 'n all. Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 3 May 2015 11:51:01 AM
| |
Dear Is Mise and Jayb,
How do I know? The information was provided by Indonesia's own attorney-general H.M. Prasetyo. It is believed that around 130 people, predominantly - foreign nationals (as of 2013) are sentenced to die in Indonesia. Ten new death sentences are handed down annually and many of the persons awaiting execution have been waiting for ten years or more. Yet as stated earlier ironically Indonesia is well noted as a strong advocate against the death penalty for its citizens abroad. Therefore the point being made is - why instead of the death penalty - doesn't Indonesia go after their own corrupt officials, police, military, and drug barons, if they are serious in preventing drug trafficking - especially when they are so selective to whom they apply the death penalty - and especially when it does not stop the trade in Indonesian communities - which continues to escalate in that region. Capital punishment is not a deterrent. And you don't need the wisdom of Solomon to see that. The facts speak for themselves. BTW: Julie Bishop left no stone unturned in trying to save the two men: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/12/australia-offers-to-pay-jail-costs-for-bali-nine-pair-if-their-lives-are-sparred It would seem that had they offered the judiciary hundreds of thousand of dollars, the impenetrable barrier to the convictions may have been lifted (as it is for the drug barons). There is documented evidence provided for this by an earlier legal adviser of Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran. I wonder what if anything our government will do with this evidence? Also the AFP will be presenting their report on this matter at a press conference early next week. Hopefully - we'll get more facts. Another question that needs to be asked - why did it take over ten years for our government to pursue this matter, why did they not pursue the matter when there was a more flexible President in Indonesia a decade ago? Posted by Foxy, Sunday, 3 May 2015 2:00:02 PM
|
I appreciate your bringing a chuckle or two into
this discussion.
Now, back to the topic ...