The Forum > General Discussion > It's time to decide, do we become 'pro active' or remain
It's time to decide, do we become 'pro active' or remain
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
-
- All
Posted by WmTrevor, Sunday, 18 January 2015 9:39:17 AM
| |
@ Trevor
<<Yours post-operatively, WilhelminaTrevor>> Perhaps you should have signed off as Willyminus Trevor...probably closer to reality ;) Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 18 January 2015 10:31:55 AM
| |
Yeah what's pro-active mean?
In Nationalist circles that kind of talk is a big flashing red light, people who go on about "dealing' with ethnic minorities or whatever are automatically pegged as agent provocateurs. There's a group active in Sydney at the moment who have been deliberately trying to provoke trouble, annoying Chinese,Muslim and Jewish people and interfering in the Save Penrith action group,it seems likely that they're either working for the state or for other parties with an interest in raising ethnic tensions. Government agents 'directly involved' in most high-profile US terror plots http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/21/government-agents-directly-involved-us-terror-plots-report?CMP=twt_gu I don't subscribe to the "false flag" model of state security provocation but it's definitely how they do business: http://noncounterproductive.blogspot.com.au/p/john-tyndall-on-harold-covington-and.html Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 18 January 2015 1:14:24 PM
| |
Poirot, by being pro active, I mean act now rather than wait for the enevidable to happen. We have already had our first terrorist attack, and we are now being threatened of more. Ban Islam from our country simply because it harbors serious violence.
If one chooses to be a Muslim, that's fine, find somewhere to do so, but while multiculturalism may be a great thing, mulsimism is a dismal failure where ever you choose to look. They do not want to just live here, they want to take over and while I accept there are plenty of decent Muslims, the fact is they draw their beliefs from the same faith/religion as extremists. I say ban the likes of the burqa dismantle mosques and shut down Muslimism in our country. Either we take these 'pro active' steps now, or we pay the price of being 're active', the choice is ours because the intentions of Muslim extremists, many being so called Australians is quite obvious. Let's face it, although we have recognized that gay marriage is real, and does happen in certain countries, we have banned it here, so why can't we do the same for Muslimism. Posted by rehctub, Monday, 19 January 2015 6:39:11 AM
| |
Crowie,
Far more people choose to smoke tobacco than are killed by terrorists. However far more persons chooses not to be murdered by Islamic terrorists than choose to smoke tobacco. When Islam first enters a democratic country they are led by the Islamic thugs to break down the social cohesion as has happened in Africa. Posted by Josephus, Monday, 19 January 2015 9:01:47 AM
| |
My God, didn't that bring out the 3 monkeys. Hear nothing, see nothing, do nothing. Meanwhile the ship is sinking.
Some people like to quote History. Usually against Western Culture. Well, Australia, (We) didn't have a Terrorist threat, of any description, until the moslems arrived in numbers. I don't blame the moslems for this. I blame the Politically Correct & Gullible Overly Sensitive, Etc. The blame for these "Lone Wolf" attacks is entirely on their shoulders. How long before these Lone Wolves band together to form a Pack? When they do & threaten the very people that defended them, then the PC & GOS will demand to be protected from the Pack they helped to create. The Government has a Policy of keeping the suspects in Australia instead of letting them join their fellow Jihadists in Syria/Iraq. Why? This is really foolish appeasement, this is a chance to rid Australia of the potential Pack. They then MUST never to be allowed to return if they survive. That, is proactive. This must prove a dilemma for the likes of those on here that support the moslems & their agenda. Should they leave to support the Caliphate or stay & grow one in Australia? What say you? Poirot, steelie, iftikha, etc, etc. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 19 January 2015 9:48:04 AM
|
[Yes, I know proactive response is an oxymoron, but I didn't start this idea of yours.]
Whatever your suggestion is does not go far enough!
Having thought long and hard about it we have to confront the reality that all of the hostages-taken, police-held-at-bay terror created crises in Australia in recent memory have been perpetrated by males.
Numbers of them by males with beards.
But since almost all males have the potential to grow beards it will be weak-willed to only rid our nation of the currently hirsute since this cannot address the risk of those cunning enough to want to create violence - or who in the future might create violence - and who know how to shave.
Being unable to look into someone's heart to know their intentions we can never-the-less look between their legs.
Some people just can't stomach to see what is in front of their faces and as you say, "...we have already waited far to long to act".
Not even the gender dysphoric should be excused the nation's purge. We must be absolutely resolute.
Yours post-operatively, WilhelminaTrevor