The Forum > General Discussion > Self-responsibility?
Self-responsibility?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Allright. Enough of being facitious.
Now to get serious.
As I stated in my earlier post the fear
of rape touches virtually all women,
instilling in them a wariness of male
strangers and an apprehension about
walking alone at night or being in deserted
places and so on. Of course, most women I know
(including myself - and my young nieces)
do take care and behave responsibly.
As do most men I know - towards women.
However lets get rid of a few myths ...
Contrary to popular belief, most rapes are
actually committed by an acquaintance of the
victim not by a stranger - by
a family friend, a neighbour, a teacher,
an employer, an ex-lover, a new dating partner.
Also victims of "date rape" are particularly reluctant
to report the crime, for they are afraid that
other people - including family, friends, and
jurors - will suspect they did something to
"ask for it."
Many people still regard rape as an
expression of unrestrained, impulsive sexual desire.
Research in recent years has proven this view to be
a myth.
Rape is a crime of violence, not of passion. It is a
ritual of power and humiliation. All the evidence
indicates that the sexual aspect of rape is of
secondary importance.
What is of a concern today to most women
is that there still exists an attempt to shift the
responsibility for the control of male advances, to
the female. This line of defense seems to be unique to the
crime of rape. "She was provocatively dressed and was therefore
at fault," et cetera.
It would seem that in this day and age -
that argument should be well and truly out-moded.
But apparently not for some men - who I suspect
are in their twilight years.