Maybe her lawyer had a point!!

Point taken Is Mise.

Cliff Richards has been interviewed by police in relation to sex allegations.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/11052093/BBC-accused-of-cover-up-over-Cliff-Richard-raid.html

One of the "positive" aspects of Old Rolf's conviction, and here we are at post 600 is the inmates down at 'The Scrubs' are in for some "quality" free entertainment. If Cliff goes for a stretch, it could be a double act. The judge didn't take that into account when determining the sentence.
I can't see what defense Cliff could possibly have. Unlike Rolf's rock solid line of "I play the wobble board, and sing silly ditties."how could Cliff match that?

Rolf H. will have some respite as the sacrificial male to sex power from women, The leader of the opposition and Cliff Richard are reluctantly filling that space for awhile until a bigger fish comes along to sacrifice.
How long will the insane use of women's power be allowed to wreck havoc, and especially the wars it has caused. Rubbishing all men as violent animals and raising the price of sex is sure to make most women gloat.
Sex must be demystified and deweaponised.
A big move. The first time in human history. We could start by educating high school students with sex dolls. No more frustration and ignorance being taken advantage of.
Wouldn't that be nice.

Now, let’s see what’s been appnin of the Rolfie thread, after having left it alone for five days.

Hey! There’s been some good discussion here. Excellent!

Firstly to the amazing Poirot….

<< I do find it fascinating how the further down you've dug your hole on this subject...and the tattier has become your OLO reputation - that your swagger has actually increased! >>

And with that statement, you have just absolutely confirmed that you are willing to take nothing but the hardest line over what really does amount to the bottom-end-of-the-scale offences of the pedophilia / child-molestation / child-touching type.

Thank goodness not everyone thinks like you do. Thank goodness there are at least some people with a better sense of perspective than that!

<< As is usually the case when folk attempt to defend the indefensible.... >>

Is this a deliberate misrepresentation of my position, or have you convinced yourself that I am trying to defend the indefensible? It’s got to be one or the other.

As I have said numerous times; it is about perspective; about matching the crime with the penalty; about NOT just utterly condemning someone who has not committed rape, not deprivation of liberty, nor any act longer than a few seconds, or about a minute with ‘C’; about NOT just taking the judge’s findings and sentences as gospel but RIGHTLY questioning and seeking to discuss them; and about being able to do this without the low-life coming down on you and accusing of all manner crap, with the express purpose of trying to defame you and derail the discussion.

<< Ludwig's attitude is basically Rolf did not commit a crime, criminal or otherwise, its all a big mistake by society,… >>

Paul, you’re an enigma.

I was under the impression that you were one of the better and more level-headed debaters on this thread. I had actually increased my respect for you as a result of this discussion.

That has just entirely evaporated.

You’ve made knowlingly false assertions about of my position.

Careful, there are laws pertaining to defamation you know.

Well done mate.

I can give you my answer, Ludwig. Not that you are listening, of course.

>>Is this a deliberate misrepresentation of my position, or have you convinced yourself that I am trying to defend the indefensible? It’s got to be one or the other.<<

You certainly have convinced me that you are "trying to defend the indefensible".

And failing miserably in the process, by the way.