Is Mise,

Apart from that one "Ludwig" post....all the other Ludwig posts are Ludwig's.

Ludwig himself would have noticed otherwise - and it didn't take him (and others on this thread) long to spot that one.

And let's face it, it wasn't hard to spot...the satire of the real Ludwig's rhetoric being way over the top.

Is Mise,

"some computers don't work well in deep holes."

Lol!

This is post 628 to officially tie with rehctub's Islamic riots thread from 2012 as the longest ever...

Galaxy Quest Jason Nesmith's catch phrase, "Never give up. Never surrender" seems to be the Ludwig motto here but unlike the situations in that fictional film, not something to be admired.

Rolf Harris pleasured himself at others' expense too, Ludwig.

Ahh Poirot, you are a classic.

Here we have OLO’s number 1 rule breaker, with many posts completely failing to address the thread topic, thus breaking rule no 1; who despite being told about it just continues to do it over and over, with impunity… … and then has the gall to tell me how I should behave regarding illegal posts and the hitting of the little red cross.

Of course I did the right thing and hit the red cross as soon as Ludwigdot’s post appeared.

So how about you do the right thing for once and STOP writing blatantly illegal posts!

Somewhere in this quagmire, there is actually a subject that is very much worth debating. So how about it Poirot.

Would you like to respond to this incredible foot-in-mouth comment from Adrian, given that he seems to be completely unable to.

For the third time; he wrote:

<< I think the difference with Harris is that most people (except Ludwig) have a deep revulsion towards the act of a grown man sexually touching underage girls; a revulsion that goes very deep into our souls… >>

<< …it's a very "personal" thing. >>

<< …and his music just makes them want to vomit. This is because of the deep, "personal" nature of pedophilia crimes. >>

He seems to be saying that for some people extremely strong personal revulsion overrides everything else. Their sense of logic or perspective is overridden by revulsion, and their feeling of revulsion is extended very strongly to anyone who says anything whatsoever that is not in full and absolute support of their revulsion!

This certainly seems to be borne out on this thread.

So what do you reckon Poirot? Is Adrian right?

Silly me.

>>Here we have OLO’s number 1 rule breaker, with many posts completely failing to address the thread topic<<

I thought the thread's topic was...

>>It seems that the worst of [Rolf Harris' crimes] was a bit of groping, which really amounts to somewhat risqué activity, and nothing worse than that.<<

And that the victims were actually to blame:

>>So how did he take her pants down and put his head right in her crotch if she wasn’t willing to let him do it? It does not compute.<<

I'm still waiting to hear whether that is still your position, Ludwig.

And there is another question that I asked just recently that is well worth getting a few responses on…. if there is actually anyone here who is genuinely interested in the thread subject…

Cossomby asked:

<< Why do you consider Harris has NO chance to redeem himself? >>

I replied:

>> I would have thought that you, and everyone else on this thread, would have totally agreed that he has no chance of redeeming himself, and that no one who is ever branded as a pedophile has any possible chance of redemption.

So, do you think that he does have a chance of doing this? <<

It is apparent that people who commit all manner of other crimes do have a chance to redeem themselves. But not with pedophilia / child molestation / child touching, no matter how minor the offences may be.

What do you think, people?