The Forum > General Discussion > An open letter to Mr Hockey. Tax reform
An open letter to Mr Hockey. Tax reform
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by Ludwig, Wednesday, 26 February 2014 11:36:25 PM
| |
Although the $300 billion was predominantly justifiable debt as a result of getting Australia through the global financial crisis with so little impact, any Coalition increase should be seen as a lack of resolve by a government unable to live within its means.
Posted by 579, Thursday, 27 February 2014 9:09:58 AM
| |
its funny how our media failed to repORT THIS
http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/wow-china-let-us-have-it-at-g20-meeting.html WOW China let the U.S. have it at the G20 meeting that just ended! The U.S. was complaining and accusing China /rissia iran.. of all sorts of financial mis-doings. China stood up to the U.S. bullying and told the truth about the U.S. economy and the printing press of the Federal Reserve. They said the U.S. was living off printed money and the U.S. economy was fake and there was nothing really backing the 'prosperity' of the U.S. China obviously knows the U.S. is running on fumes and was not going to stand for the U.S. trying to bully them. The U.S. is going down in stature in every respect. Posted by one under god, Thursday, 27 February 2014 10:50:36 AM
| |
OUG, a readable post !
Keep it up and I might start reading your posts again. Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 27 February 2014 3:43:00 PM
|
Absolutely right Bazz.
You’d never think we have had an economic bonanza with the mining boom for the last decade or more, and that now while it is still rocking along at a good rate, the alarm bells are being rung about the state of the tax base and Federal budget!
What does this say about the basics? About the facilitation of massive population growth? About the never-ending manic promotion of growth per se, without any thought of the need to refine the good growth and eliminated the bad growth as far as possible? About the complete lack of concern regarding the matching of supply and demand and doing it in a sustainable manner?
Their solutions are just more of the same tried and FAILED approach!
They’re still not thinking about sustainability, nor anywhere remotely near it. They haven’t got a chance of balancing the books until they do.