The Forum > General Discussion > How can they get away with this.
How can they get away with this.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
Posted by chrisgaff1000, Saturday, 22 February 2014 9:13:43 PM
| |
we recently had a weak end..to the theory..of evolution
but it WAS IGNORED..[how can they get away..with this?] anyhow..SEEms..there is more to the particle/wave therum uantum theorem shakes foundations The wavefunction is a real physical object after all, say researchers. * Eugenie Samuel Reich http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-theorem-shakes-foundations-1.9392 Mathematical device or physical fact? The elusive nature of the quantum wavefunction..may be pinned down at last. At the heart of the weirdness for which the field of quantum mechanics is famous is the wavefunction, a powerful but mysterious entity that is used to determine the probabilities that quantum particles will have certain properties. WHICH..reopens the question of what the wavefunction represents — with an answer that could rock quantum theory to its core. Whereas many physicists have generally interpreted the wavefunction as a statistical tool that reflects our ignorance of the particles being measured, the authors of the latest paper argue that, instead, it is physically real. edit ..since Bell’s theorem, the 1964 result in which Northern Irish physicist John Stewart Bell proved that if quantum mechanics describes real entities,..it has to include..THE mysterious FIRST Cause..“action at a distance”. Action at a distance occurs when pairs of quantum particles interact in such a way that they become entangled. But the new paper, by a trio of physicists led by Matthew Pusey at Imperial College London, presents a theorem showing that if a quantum wavefunction were purely a statistical tool, then even quantum states that are unconnected across space and time would be able to communicate with each other. As that seems very unlikely to be true, the researchers conclude that the wavefunction must be physically real after all...thus the first cause is real too. http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-theorem-shakes-foundations-1.9392 but why no one..talking? avoidance ? How can they get away with this. Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 26 February 2014 9:25:04 AM
| |
http://ericpetersautos.com/2014/02/28/clover-gil/
EPautos’ most legendary troll, of course, is Clover. He’s been posting his non sequiturs here for years. Clover’s habit is to repeat – over and over – the same cliches, and to ignore all factual rebuttals. It is very tiresome to have to correct him on the same point dozens of times. But that is just the point (for Clover). To be tiresome. To waste time. To divert meaningful debate/conversation. Gil is another recurrent troll. Also been coming here for years. Like Clover, Gil never – not once! – acknowledges a factual rebuttal or point made. He simply repeats the same non sequiturs over and over and over, hoping someone will respond and waste time and energy attempting to set the record straight. (Hence the term, troll; Gil is trolling like a fisherman, hoping someone will “bite.”) The classic example of Gil’s technique is his adamant refusal to acknowledge the non-aggression principle as the basis of Libertarian ethics. The concept has been carefully explained literally scores of times – yet Gil goes on and on about how Libertarians “just want to do whatever they like” regardless of the consequences. No genuine person can be this stupid. Therefore, his obtuseness is contrived. He is here to annoy and disrupt – just like Clover. http://ericpetersautos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/troll-last-239x300.png Posted by one under god, Saturday, 1 March 2014 8:12:22 PM
|
Hiding the details about who did what only presumes that the learned judges and general jury participants are complete idiots and will not judge on evidence or merits.
That is hogwash
Many other cases have been brought to light by the exposure of suspects before conviction and I believe that this exposure should be evidential in any current prosecution on the basis of predilection.