a-lex/quote/..<<..You're sounding a bit more negative on this
subject.>>

funny i was trying to 'go easy'..just IN CASE
NO WRONG WORDS..HECK ILL SPILL it out

how did we go?

anyhow yes im a bit upset..from things heard..ON ALEX JONES
http://xml.nfowars.net/Alex.rss
whos unclE/COUSAN..DIED..FROM BAD MEDICIN

and michael
http://republicbroadcasting.org/Stang/index.php?cmd=archives.month&ProgramID=77&year=14&month=2&backURL=index.php%253Fcmd%253Darchives.getyear%2526ProgramID%253D77%26year%3D14%26backURL%3Dindex.php%253Fcmd%253Darchives

who near died ..last week..in hospital
and my other mates..with docter issues..i grey a few more gray hairs
BUT FOUND THE MEANING..Of life
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6207&page=0

noticed the judicury of jury nulifications principles
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=16009&page=0

preserved..what remains of our common wealth
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6230&page=0

and studied the war/law and so much more
but yes we need more love..

where is the love[?]..lOVE
how is our luv lover?
hows hubby../*/..heard any good jokes lately?..[?]

oh one big issue..i just cANT SEEM TO GET THROUGH CLEARLY
RE THE EVOLUTION/Weak end..see i figure..evolution adherants need verify..their thesis[i reason..that we wrote down..and kept record of mens witness of god..in our holy texts

each prophet has this personal witness..sureLY..TO REFUTE GOD..IS TO CALL SO MANY GOOD TRUE..TO BE LIARS..THATS UNFAIR..BOTH TO THEM..AND GOD?

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15995&page=0

SO...YEp im A BIT/off..
but better for heaRING..FROM U

HAPPY VALINITNES DAY
[FROM A SECRET ADMIRER]

x0x0x000xx0xxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX*....

/O\\*//O\

Dear Johan (OUG),

You always cheer me up.
So right back at you with a big hug.
Take it easy.
Tomorrow is another day.
And we're both still here. ;-)

No difference, they all stand for the same core values.

What do I see as the differences between the two major parties?

NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUTHING…. of any significance!

They’re the liblabs, two peas in a pod, tweedle dumb and tweedle eversoslighlydumber!

They’re both stuck out at the same end of the political spectrum, while the rest of the spectrum is pretty well unoccupied…. except for the Sustainable Population Party, which is in the dead centre, right where both major parties should be!!

<< The Labor Party believes…. [in] sustainability >>

Erm……….. No they DON'T!!

Kelvin Thomson certainly does. Bob Carr did. Julia Gillard might have. But their party has made absolutely sure that they weren’t ever going to go anywhere with it.

<< When a voter understands these core differences and holds an opinion on these opposing values, the values should, in a sensible world, strongly influence which party they vote for. >>

Foxy, the ‘core’ differences that you quoted are extremely fuzzy, and if they are real at all they are not of much consequence. Especially when you consider the insane facilitation of manic very rapid and never-ending growth …. and hence antisustainability, they are both addicted to, and compare that to the SPP policy platform of sustainability.

Voters should be very carefully looking at what they are offering compared to what SPP is espousing, and decide who to vote for on that basis.

They should absolutely NOT be only comparing the Libs with the Labs and deciding to vote for one or the other on the basis of something which really is very insignificant in the bigger picture.

Not much difference - they both believe that they have a right to order us around.

In name only, the Liberal party are supposed to believe otherwise, that ordinary people should be able to do whatever they like so long as they do not hurt others, but in practice the Liberal party (and especially Tony abbott) are not liberal at all.

The libs want flexibility in the work place, while the union intrenched labor party won't recognize that the conditions enjoyed now, where secured during boom times.

The other major difference is that labor waves a blank cheque book at big business, while the libs say, if you want to invest in our country use some of your profits to do so, not our taxes.

Furthermore, labor is focused on buying jobs, while the libs are focused on encouraging business to prosper and create REAL jobs, not subsidized jobs.

Then of cause there's the doozy of all doozies, the libs have stopped the boats, something that not only did labor create, but couldn't stop in six years, compared to less than six months.