The Forum > General Discussion > So what's wrong with sending them back?
So what's wrong with sending them back?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
- 16
- 17
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
It is mildly ironic that you --and those of your persuasion -- take great exception to anyone questioning the integrity of the "asylum seekers" but can readily write off anyone who does so as inhumane, cynical or worse.
The illegal boaties have sullied their own names:
1) The Middle Easterners jet into Indonesia or Malaysia then --for appearances sake --change into their civvies and hire a boat to Oz.
2) Best practice under Rudd & co was to get a short way off the Indonesian coast and then use their mobiles to call the HMAS taxi service.
3) Practically all of them destroy their IDs (though you don't want to believe it)
4) Practically all of them repeat the same generic rote learnt story to get acceptance
5) And we are finding that after securing their meal ticket in Oz many --and in time most-- return to their much feared places of origin to holiday --or even fight for fundamentalist causes they supposed ran from.
And, you might recall the incident when the Viking Princess rescued some (intending) illegals, and they repaid the act of humanitarianism by commandeered the ship and refusing to leave till they got a destination of choice (only affluent Western countries would do!).
And there have been similar incidents with merchant ships.
These are not one-offs! they are very much standardized practices.
What does it take to make you people realize that you are being had?
I'll wager that despite all your bigheartedness you would not accept similar from a tradesperson or tenant or employee.