Don't be so silly Paul, they are trying to buy the feminist vote, & the general women's vote. Nothing to do with trying to elevate good competent women, they are promoting the women with factional backing.

This means the worst of them are getting the nod, nothing to do with competence. The whole lot of them, male as well, advance the system player, the lurk worker, who knows how to buy political support gets on.

Just look at the number of them in the courts now, for working the system illegally, if you believe that rubbish.

Hasbeen, no danger of the misogynistic Liberals buying the general woman's vote, unless you count the $75,000 for the very rich baby makers.

lets reset..away from..the..money/material..motivations
and return..to..the sexist..stuff[that didnt sound right]..regardless

quoted..extracted..from
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6079&page=0

This variety of..•taste,[preferences/expressed]..
which is obvious...at but..a casual glance..turns out on examination..to/be..even •greater ..in reality..than/in appearance...

Men often differ..about
beauty and ugliness..of all kinds,..
even when they talk in..the same way..[culturaly]..
of what/kinds of things..are beautiful..and what kinds..of expressions..are ugly.

Every/'language..contains some words..*that imply blame,
others/that imply praise;..yet others..our inner feelings loves/hate/bias..em[rem]-motions]..and all..those who/use..that language/must agree..in how they..shall/apply them.

All the voices are/united..in applauding elegance,propriety, simplicity,the essence/or spirit..in writing;..and in blaming pomposity,/affectation,/coldness/and spurious glitter.[misscreations]

But..when critics..get down/to particular-details,..this
seeming unanimity..*vanishes..and they/we..turn-out..to have given very different..personalized/-or-\rationalized/meanings*..to their words...[as afflicted..by our works/and life experiences.

An explanation..of..the words/contextualized/meaning..usually ends the controversy,,,and the disputants..are surprised to learn that basically..that..*they agreed..in their/judgment..all the time when they were quarrelling.

·AN ASIDE..ON MORAL DIFFERENCES·

Those who base morality..on sentiment..more than on
reason..are inclined/to..apply the former observation..[about
differences/of taste/standard..or measure)..also into ethics, maintaining..that in all/questions.;.concerning conduct and life-styles..men really differ/more than they appear..to.

at first sight...It is indeed..obvious/that writers..of
all nations..and all-ages..of all sexes/races/status..agree in *applauding..justice,/humanity,/magnanimity,/prudence,/truthfulness,
grace/love/mercy..compassion/empathy..and..in*.blaming the opposite qualities.

Even poets and other
authors—whose works mainly
aim-to please..the imagination
are nevertheless..found to instill..the same moral_precepts
and to applaud/blame the same..virtues/vices...

This great unanimity is..usually credited to/the..influence of plain reason,..which in all these..cases maintains..similar sentiments..in all men,[but let woman..speak..for thyself.

full/context

Paul1405,
If those very rich baby makers, you speak of, spent five years in University to learn her career and five years paying tax on an income of $150,000 then the $75,000 for a year off to care for her child is virtually downsizing her career choice. You prefer to keep her working and paying taxes to fund unemployed girls to have babies in low economic conditions. Sounds to you promote politics of envy.

$75,000 for the very rich baby makers.
Paul1405,
You're forgetting those where grandma looks after the kids & therefore collects child support as well as the mother whos in the pub all day playing the pokies. On top of that Grandma & Grand dad & Mum & dad are all on unemployment plus when they need to fly somewhere the health department is paying for family escorts also. Plus if they happen to miss the flight another one is booked for the next day. There are very many of them. Then there are those in the public service who literally fly somewhere at least once a fortnight but no-one knows what they actually do. Of course all the taxpayer funded flights give the public servants Qantas frequent flyer Gold cards. Just let me know if you're interested in talking about rorts & corruption & standover tactics in the public service. It'd make an enlightening discussion. Ah, & not to forget the consultants appointed by the bureaucrats to cover for them. Gee, nearly forgot to mention that 50% of those mentioned are women.

Paul1405,
two days ? shouldn't take you that long to prove me "wrong" , should it ?