The news tells us UN climate chief Christiana Figueres has attacked Tony Abbott's carbon plan.

Well what do you know? Do you think that just might be because that fool Gillard promised 20% of our carbon dioxide tax to the UN?

You have to agree, anything that goes the opposite way to the most corrupt organisation ever seen on the planet, has to be going in the right direction.

It might be a good idea on the UNs behalf, to shut the fool Ms. Figueres up. Every time they flog the dead horse of their pet money redistribution vehicle, climate change, they wake up, & alienate just a few more of the slumbering public.

Who the hell is this bird anyway? Where is our much loved Indian railway engineer, who has been pushing the crap for the UN this last decade?

Now we know?.
Once a man said every thing that could be invented had been.
This threads thoughts and directions is as wrong as that man was.
And the amazing thing is Hasbeens views ignore science and mounting world action.
May you live long and prosper Hasbeen, and look back in ten or fifteen years at these thoughts with a clearer understanding.
And by then the events in this area as they will be then.

this country would not have a cigarette butt on its ground if half the wasted money ripped off the tax payers was paid in improving our environment rather than green religious zealots and public servants. Imagine we had of done the necessary clearing before the bushfires. Are not the UN the fools who are backing terrorist against Israels democracy. Why do Labour/Greens keep selling out to these fools. Last nights Q&A was revealing when the guest Chinese academic xpressed the opinion that the Chinese Government could not give a stuff about gw. Tony Jones had to quickly move on to stop him saying anymore.

Belly Belly Belly, mate have a real look.

Germany, Spain, France, Belgium & Denmark are all running away from alternate energy, & the stupid subsidies they paid, just as fast as their little legs will carry them. It is only the fool Poms left in Europe that are still killing themselves with it.

There is a fair bit of evidence that it is vested interests in the present UK government members, & the large land holders where windmills are sighted that keep it going.

Add the absolute stupidity of the UK importing wood chips from the USA to replace coal, despite this increasing total emissions, & I can't see how anyone with a single thought can support it. It is all expensive gesture, with no substance.

It is a great program for corruption on a grand scale, left alone by the media, as they "believe".

Even Germanys premier magazine has recently come out against the fool alternate energy schemes. When greenie journalists start knocking it, you know alternate power generation is really stinking so badly they can no longer ignore it.

Have a good look around mate, I think you're missing a bit. You should not let your dislike of the Libs colour your thought processes, on something so important.

Dear Hasbeen,

The pollution problem is an exceedingly difficult one
to solve, for several reasons. First some people and
governments see pollution as a regrettable but inevitable
by-product of desired economic development -
"Where there's smoke, there's jobs." Second, control of
pollution requires international co-ordination. Third, the
effects of pollution may not show up for many, many years,
so severe environmental damage can occur with little
public awareness that it is taking place. Fourth, preventing
or correcting pollution can be costly, technically complex,
and sometimes - when the damage is irreversible -
impossible. In general, the most industrialised nations are
now actively trying to limit the effects of pollution,
but the populous less developed societies are more
concerned with economic growth, and tend to see pollution as
part of the price they have to pay for it.

Mr Abbott was elected leader of his party primarily because
of his opposition to placing a price on carbon. He has no
choice but to continue with that particular stand.
Also there are powerful vested interests in Australia
including the fossil fuel lobby, the mining industry, and
carbon intensive corporations that are heavy donors to Mr
Abbott's Liberal Party. The following link lists the
amounts donated and the reasons why Mr Abbott has to abolish
the carbon price. It also explains the Liberal's policy and
why it is considered a sham and the fact that no credible
organisation, economist, or scientific body supports Mr Abbott's
direct action policy.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/southern-crossroads/2013/sep/18/tony-abbott-abolish-carbon-price

It remains difficult for some to come to terms with the results of the election.