The Forum > General Discussion > Are the Greens responsible for loss of property due to fire?
Are the Greens responsible for loss of property due to fire?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- ...
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
will avoid a similar fate to the one that some
Victorians experienced when a heatwave hit
Melbourne prior to 7 Feb. 2009. It was those
who had the least capacity to insulate themselves
from it that suffered the most.
Victoria recorded 374 deaths, a 62 percent increase
compared with the year before. When Black Saturday arrived
Melbourne's temperature soared but it wasn't just the
heat that claimed lives - the devastating fires took 173 souls
and whole communities.
We might be a nation prone to bushfires - but why would anyone
want us to not discuss the possibility of a link with
climate change and future possible predictions of what
could be in our future. We need to discuss the possibility of
having more bushfires - and how to deal with them.
Doing anything less is irresponsible.
Wendy Kramer summed things up rather aptly when she said:
"Whether or not it's unseemly for Green politicians
to raise the spectre of future cataclysmic climate
change when bushfires are still raging out of control,
there's no doubt that many of us who looked up to bruised
and belligerent skies swirling with ash and a drift of
incinerated gum leaves had to wonder 'is this what the
future will be like?'"