The Forum > General Discussion > Are the Greens responsible for loss of property due to fire?
Are the Greens responsible for loss of property due to fire?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
It is the loss of forestry, & the forest service, & their control of dangerous bush that is the start of the problem. Then the handing over of swathes of forest to the clowns in national parks that finished the job.
Since the takeover, national parks have not only stopped maintaining the fire trails, allowing them to become barely passable due to erosion, but they have dug trenches through some trails & dragged logs across others, to stop access.
On some resort islands, management who took over maintenance of walking tracks in parks, which the parks service no longer did, have been threatened with prosecution, if they touch anything at all.
The parks service has become as nasty & vindictive as a spoilt brat, more interested in limiting public access to parks, than maintaining them. It is a bureaucratic mess, past it's time. It should be closed, & anyone above ranger chucked on the dole que, & the whole thing, including rangers passed to forestry, who could at least reduce the fire threat.