The Forum > General Discussion > Specs for a new On Line Opinion
Specs for a new On Line Opinion
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Monday, 21 October 2013 1:22:20 PM
| |
It's not a question of stepping on anyone's
bunions that should be a concern here. None of us want a lifeless forum. Ideas should be challenged and we all understand that discussions may be heated at times due to certain topics - however posters should stick to attacking a person's arguments rather than their person. Attacking a person's fundamental traits and character and provoking flaming should garner a trolling infraction. Nobody is suggesting that we make this a dull and boring forum - only requesting that personally attacking posters should be made a no-go area. Who knows this just may raise the bar on discussions. After all as we know its far easier to insult than to actually discuss an issue. Posted by Foxy, Monday, 21 October 2013 5:24:53 PM
| |
cont'd ...
I forgot to add that yes - most posters do self-moderate (or at least try to do so), however they're not the ones that cause the problems in the first place. Posted by Foxy, Monday, 21 October 2013 5:28:08 PM
| |
i..tried your huffington..post link
it takes a long time to load pages..and will be expensive..with all..the imagery..they are huge pages..[digitally speaking] i visited 3 stories..boring..then this http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/18/20-psychological-studies-_n_4098779.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular this looked interesting..but reading the replies.. i didnt see one link..not one..i..love links there were from..memory 14 replies with 75 pending*.... i could have posted..via my face-off...or tweeters but know my comment..wont get..past their..VERY SLOW MODS its too..glossy..too slow but thats..just my..opinion.. besides i love links....and faster upload [my computer is still..slow..so im..closing the link.. despite the article looking very interesting..the format..[for me]..seems clunky Posted by one under god, Monday, 21 October 2013 5:57:18 PM
| |
Graham,
Being an engineer I like to focus on features that provide utility to the user. 1 Get the links to open on the last page (or page 0) rather than the first page, as I am normally looking for recent comments. This is especially useful for phones. 2 The use of phones to post comments is questionable, as anyone using a phone is most likely to post a twitteresque sound bite with no research or serious thought, which the vacuous twitteratti of the left are so fond. 3 Nested comments within a thread would be useful, as it would enable those that would divert a thread to continue their conversation while others can focus on the original issue. All in all the existing format is a pleasant place to vent one's spleen, and the old adage of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" is a good guide to avoid adding features without functionality. Posted by Shadow Minister, Tuesday, 22 October 2013 6:57:41 AM
| |
i agree with the nested comment..thing
but who..decides what nests or what rests? still..for retaining context..[often..the context too..has importance] anything..is better than deletion.. mods are..important..but we all..have inherent bias..possibility and..keeping the ego..separated from the ergo..seems the go. again..i need re-state.. my biggest bug bear[dead links] is there not..a way..to make a attributed/fair-use.. on-site..link cache..stash..[in-house link..in the posting box memory]..? anyhow Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 22 October 2013 7:58:21 AM
|
re..the articles motion
i..dislike the 4 reply/limitation..of articles
if article-poster..wants to reply..all respondants..
4 replies..wont be enough..[thus i love the 8..reply format]
but each..has its use
[can..it be by..option..of article auther?
that said..i would like to..write..an..rever expanding article..
that adds pages..to original article[as the thread replies develop..the concept
the reply box..couldbe the record..of how the text evolved
...but for better suggestions..the replies..offerd..
thus as the facts change..the origonal as..the article/commentary..expands..
a potentially..never ending story
that closes..with the last..reply
[its like a summery..of the blog replies]
but needs ability..to expand/edit..posted articles..[via an edit function]
generally speaking..i hate facebook/tweeters etc
BUT..them..[their members]..accessing our forum..via their id/password..can..only be good
plus their posts go..into..facebook..
where it can..be more easy be noticed..by friends/followings etc
but if it means..us only logging
into olo..via facebook/tweeter..no..
those formats i have found to be totally useless..
from tweet-boxes..not posting..to..face-books un certainties
for..them..to access olo..great..
us..posting on..to face-off..and tweeters..no way
[that said..i..love sharing a great post..
with..just a click..of the button..thus do..use them..
to put it there..a few times..[but thats...their only good use]