The Forum > General Discussion > What Does Mr Abbott Stand For?
What Does Mr Abbott Stand For?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- ...
- 60
- 61
- 62
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Friday, 28 June 2013 2:30:52 PM
| |
Does Labor have a leader of all the Party in Rudd when some have resigned as they will not serve under him. Many believe he failed to lead last time his elected colleagues. He may be popular with voters but not in the Party room.
Posted by Josephus, Friday, 28 June 2013 2:45:45 PM
| |
PM Rudd has announced today that electing Tony Abbott would result in a war with Indonesia!
"KEVIN Rudd says Tony Abbott's asylum-seeker boat tow back policy risks sparking a war with Indonesia" http://www.news.com.au/national-news/federal-election/kevin-rudd-says-tony-abbott8217s-asylum-seeker-policy-risks-a-diplomatic-crisis-with-indonesia/story-fnho52ip-1226671337940 PM for a day and already he is an embarrassment. What the hell was he thinking? Posted by onthebeach, Friday, 28 June 2013 2:58:42 PM
| |
Dear onthebeach,
It's quite obvious what Mr Rudd was thinking. He made his position quite clear on Parliamentary "Question Time," yesterday. Mr Rudd pointed to statements from Indonesia that it would not co-operate with the Coalition's policy of turning back asylum seeker boats. As a result of this, Mr Rudd encouraged Mr Abbott to "take briefings on what further could be done," on asylum policy, challenging the Coalition leader to get briefings from government departments and security agencies so the Mr Abbott could talk about "policies that work as opposed to slogans that sound good." Good advice, and it would be great if the advice was taken. I only wish that we had more people in politics like Tony Windsor and Rob Oakshott, the two Independents who will be leaving politics after the next election. Mr "Point of Order," Christopher Pyne made the asinine statement that the reason the Independents are leaving politics is that they think they won't get re-elected. A truly asinine statement given their 2010 election results, and a perfect example of the type of nonsense to which the Independents (and the former PM) have been subjected. These two Independents are an example of how politicians should work. They're resonable men who took their job seriously. They insisted on scrutiny, research and consultation. They tried to act in the best interests of the nation, even when it had the potential to damage their own causes. What a shame that there's not more like them. And our Parliement will be the poorer for their absence. Posted by Lexi, Friday, 28 June 2013 3:42:04 PM
| |
Rudd was clearly referring to *DIPLOMATIC* conflict. Only his opponents would twist his words to means something that was not said.
Posted by PJack, Friday, 28 June 2013 3:47:11 PM
| |
Lexi,
You don't reckon that talking about war with a neighbouring country is serious? You have got to be kidding. And he is about to set off on a diplomatic mission there! Please come back Julia, all is forgiven! Julia, you should have run over the idiot with a large dozer, twice. Posted by onthebeach, Friday, 28 June 2013 3:51:34 PM
|
It's quite entertaining that Libs apologists are pissed off that Labor refused to just trickle out the door.
How dare Labor take a real stab at reeling back some support.
They should have had the decency to go quietly.
Apparently Julie Bishop was just now blowing a gasket on Sky News about something Rudd said in his latest interview.
Here's to blowing gaskets!