Agronomist it is now conspiracy fact. How do you explain 3 buildings on 911 collapsing at near free fall speeds meaning that they had to be controlled demolition and not a gravitational collapse due to fires or plane impacts.http://www.ae911truth.org/

You obiviously either refuse to look at the evidence or have other agendas. Ditto for Pericles.

We have the GFC and theft of our savings with no one being charged, money printing, use of derivatives to bankrupt countries illegal wars, Obama stripping away basic human rights, legalising assassinations, illegally tapping into our communications and now evidence of secret meetings.

Is the truth just to horrible to contemplate?

Surely you are getting tired of grinding that same old organ, Arjay, with the same old monkey on your shoulder...

>>How do you explain 3 buildings on 911 collapsing at near free fall speeds...<<

How does Bilderberg fit into this scenario?

At which conference did they sit down and decide that they should ask the CIA (or whoever) to mobilize a team of people to lay hundreds of explosive devices in an occupied building without being detected, and then arrange for those devices to be detonated on the same day as a couple of other buildings had (or had not) been hit by airliners flown by (more CIA?) zealots, to give the US an excuse to invade Afghanistan (or wherever), simply in order to make a property owner super-rich from the insurance money. Or not.

So many questions. So few answers... from you, that is.

Arjay, the three WTC buildings did not free-fall. I am happy to link to the engineering research papers that discuss this, as I have done in the past, but this entry level discussion should help you http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

If the towers were in free fall, they should have been falling as fast as the debris. They didn’t, not even close.

But what does the not at all secret Bilderberg Meetings have to do with this? Other than crank magnetism.

Have a look at this one Arjay, he fingers the Bilderbergs. His first bit about aliens is interesting, I know they are out there, but didn't think they were residing here...ninety or not he has credibility and a brilliant career without any other paranoia’s excepting aliens and OWG.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9z4n_yF9E28

>>P, if you have to ask “who” I am eluding to this conversation is over.<<
Pericles>> That's just chickening out, sonofgloin...<<

Yeah, sorry P it came across as an ultimatum, but the sentiment was more along the lines of one of Poirot’s “sheesh’s”.

P>> >>I would control the global monetary system…they do.<<

Oh yeah? In what way?<<

Rather than getting into what organizations form the global monetary cabal, I will describe two of their works:

A year before Billiton stole BHP the Aussie dollar was 65 cents, a year after Billiton stole BHP the Aussie dollar was 65 cents. Billiton bought BHP at a 49 cent midpoint of that two year U curve. Extremely fortuitous to have purchased at the lowest point of the cycle and amazingly we have not seen a 49 cent dollar since.

In 2008 the banks that control the Global Monetary Cabal sent the Northern Hemisphere into bankruptcy and then cajoled the free world governments into bailing them out with what was left of the citizen’s money.

There you go P, two examples of total control of a monetary system

P>>. >>I would control world trade…they do.<<

If that is so, they don't do it well<<

They control it well enough to have moved all production to the second and third world, while getting rid of international trade protection legislations in the first world.

>>I would control governments…they do.<<

What, someone is actually controlling Julia Gillard? Doing a lousy job of it, is all I can say.<<

Gillard and Abbott can talk about misogyny and immigration till the cows come home, they don’t control the banks and they don’t control the nation’s future. As I said all first world governments sign free trade agreements. We don’t want them signed, we want jobs to stay in Australia…but they get signed…by both sides of the house.

P>> So tell me, do you actually know who "they" are? Or are they just some imaginary bogey-man concoction that you can pretend exists<<

God you are harsh P, but harsh does not cover a corpus callosum that is on the fritz.

Agronomist>> If the towers were in free fall, they should have been falling as fast as the debris. They didn’t, not even close.<<

Ag, debris schmee, they were in free fall.

If the buildings are in free fall they do not encounter resistance.
If the building does not encounter resistance it falls into its own footprint.
Why did the two towers encounter no resistance? They should have.
Pre hot charge demolition we had never seen a multi storey building pancake, except when the earth shook.
Fire couldn’t do it and old time demolition started from the top and worked down.

Since hot charge demolition we have only seen 2 structures pancake into their own footprint without hot charges and one demolished in an hour, in the same place, on the same day.

Have a peek at Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder who with partner, our own Frank Lowie cleaned up on the insurance of these coming to their use by date buildings. Larry tells a fireman to freefall a building into its own footprint, and they do it in an hour….Why do the demolition guys take weeks. Firemen could demolish four or five a day at that rate. I hours notice, it pancakes.

Old Larry must have took too much viagra that morning and has not said a sylable about it since.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk