Out of town, phone access only.
Spin doctor, a puerile and naive thread.
Will give you benefit of doubt.
Back in a few days.

Qanta : out of town,out of touch --what's new!

mhaze,

Just spotted this in my travels....

This "Nobel Laureate" thing seems to be catching.

http://www.readfearn.com/2011/07/monckton-not-in-control-of-his-own-biography/

Poirot, csteele, qanda, wobbles and warmair,

It’s interesting that for so long you have subjected us to the incessant CAGW teachings and the high esteem in which you hold your teachers.

Now you are forced to defend them?

qanda says the thread itself is “puerile and naïve”. csteele is off with the fairies as he does his “Rumpold of the Bailey” routine, denies all the statements from his own team and tries to put the “messengers” in the dock. Odd that, shouldn’t is be those who conned us in the dock?

Poirot finds a much needed distraction in more links to irrelevancy in defence of Michael Mann, a person who ranks up there with Al Gore as one of the greatest CAGW fraudsters.

Meanwhile all this furious activity has not given us the answer?

The public statements are as follows;

The Hadley Centre/CRU records show no warming for 18 years (v.3) or 19 years (v.4),

The RSS satellite dataset shows no warming for 23 years (h/t to Werner Brozek for determining these values).

Phil Jones, EAU/CRU states under oath during UK parliamentary hearings 2010 states “There has been no statistically significant global warming since 1995”

IPCC’s climate “science” panel has admitted there has been no global warming for 17 years,

London Met Office admits no warming for 17 years

James Hansen, NASA’s GISS is in agreement Hadley Centre/CRU findings.

For each of the periods over the last 17, 18, 19, or 23 years (take your pick), all of these scientific establishments have now told us that “during these periods” there was no global warming. Yet there are thousands of warmertariat commentaries over these same periods telling us the world was still warming when clearly it was not.

So the question remains. Tell us for these periods, which was true? Was the world warming during these periods or was it not?

Nothing to do with the previous self evidently flawed temperature records and nothing to do with unfulfilled future trend “scientific predictions”. Just address the contradictions for the periods to which your own scientists refer.

spindoc,

I'll leave you to waffle away to yourself on the semantics....(we've been through all this before:)

.................

I thought this was interesting.

http://climatecrocks.com/2013/02/24/the-making-of-a-classic-climate-graph/#more-14096

Yes m'lord, I also thought the matter had been dealt with and the defendants either committed or keeping their counsel but it appears Mr Spindoc felt the need to renounce his vow of silence and add to his considerable record of verbal-ling.

No m'lord it appears some people never learn.

The arresting officer m'lord? Let me see, constable Oh Sung Wu m'lord of the NSW police force. Oh m'lord it is perhaps a little unfair to say they are experts in verbal-ling but I'm sure the good constable knows it when he sees it, however I can assure the court by all accounts this particular member of the force has an outstanding record.

Yes m'lord however it was after hours and there was no action taken, and who among us can say they haven't imbibed to excess on occasion.

If it pleases the court the prosecution calls Mr Spindoc to the stand.

Mr Spindoc, it is alleged and not denied by yourself, that on Tuesday, the 26th of February 2013 at 8:20:48 AM you wilfully and maliciously verbal-led one Mr Jones by claiming that he stated under oath during UK parliamentary hearings 2010 “There has been no statistically significant global warming since 1995”.

I put it to you that Mr Jones never uttered the words “There has been no statistically significant global warming since 1995” during the parliamentary inquiry. They are not to be found in the transcripts which can be found here;

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/387b/38701.htm

Nor in the clip of the hearing which can be found here;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_DVg0ZWzG4

I further put to you that your actions are those of a desperate man intent on putting words into the mouths of others to advance a discredited and unscientific stance of global warming.

Can you please explain to the court why you persist in this unsavoury practice?