gather some data,
Anthonyve,
You mean data written by the likes of yourself based on the opinion of the likes of yourself ? Get real ! My statements aren't opinion based, they're based on undeniable fact, facts that the likes of you constantly refute because once people become more aware of how much mismanagement goes on & will continue they'll vote accordingly. And the so-called educated certainly want to protect the rackets that protect them.
I put it to you that you're the one that uses his opinion.

Anton, I havnt read thenwhole article, but what I did read was related to fire risk.

I am afraid that's to do with the aftermath of the insulation debacle, what I am referring to is the fact that, despite the many warnings received by Mr Garretts office, FROM INDUSTRY EXPERTS, which he and Mr Rud CONTINUALLY CHOSE TO IGNORE, four young lives were needlessly lost.

Now, tell me honestly, if either of thipese gentlemen were members of a company board, do you think they would have simply been ushered away to alternative roles, without any case to be answered.

In fact, I'll answer it myself, as the answer is clearly NO!

Btw, if the risk of fire is minimal, why are we now spending yet more tax payers dollars checking the safety of the batts.

Don't worry Anton, the truth often hurts, as facts are hard to dispute.

Rechtub forgive Anthonyv, he has not been around long enough to know the real you.
He in time will get to understand you never let truth get in to the dark place you mind is in if Labor/workers/unions/dole bludgers/humanity is involved?
Disagree?
Read, with an open mind, your post history.

So enlighten me Belly, where am I wrong in my last post, the one referring to the deaths of four young people.

Ar Belly, you just hate being PROVEN WRONG don't you.

Just run away and pop up on another thread, waiting for the right moment to either call someone, I'll informed, or just take your bat and ball and run away.

Perhaps it's you who should check their post history, to see how many times this has happened.