The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Craig Thomson, the real reason for setting the election date?

Craig Thomson, the real reason for setting the election date?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. 20
  14. 21
  15. 22
  16. All
The latest from Peter Wicks:

http://wixxyleaks.com/2013/02/06/here-we-go-again/

"...most people are not aware that each alleged offence in this case is actually two charges. The doubled number reported so it looks worse for the defendant, it looks like things are twice as bad as they are. The second charge is laid for the authorisation of the alleged purchase, for example buying an ice cream is the charge, signing the credit card slip authorising payment for the ice cream is another."
Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 7 February 2013 7:58:28 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
those defending the indefensible are like the Catholic hierachy that explained away child abuse. Instead of being shamed into silence they still condone the putried actions of some trade unionist. No surprise in a day of moral relativism. Maybe Dawkins and his mob can give some absolution at the next meeting of the godless.
Posted by runner, Thursday, 7 February 2013 1:30:59 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yes, runner,

Brilliant!!

I see that you're a supporter of the "presumption of innocence" too(insert Sarmark here)....

I expect that from you as you're inordinately judgmental of your fellow man in general

Well done : )
Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 7 February 2013 3:21:29 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I am heartily sick of the fawning and grovelling about our legal system. Judges were all once lawyers and they interpret the law. Of course some molest children, take bribes and hopelessly interpret the law.
CT sued Fairfax when they reported his union misdeeds, CT sued them and then dropped the action with the Labour party picking up the legal tab. I really do not think I have to labour this point because it is so obvious.
You fawn over the judges and our legal system (Here is a tip read Bleak House) and I will wish we had kept the pillory as a punishment.
Posted by JBowyer, Thursday, 7 February 2013 5:38:10 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Casting the first stone again Runner?
Posted by wobbles, Thursday, 7 February 2013 9:49:23 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nice to see all is well in the land of?....:) But back to the topic Of Craig Thomson, the legal system of what? will tell if the spade is a spade. I think any human can make a? Question is, how can one look up to those that make these points of miss----well, you might get the point:).......The law will be, and in that I trust.

As for his vote, he must be leased(punt intended) for the time being, and all must wait for the out come.

Planet3
Posted by PLANET3, Thursday, 7 February 2013 10:12:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. 20
  14. 21
  15. 22
  16. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy