The Forum > General Discussion > The Seas are Rising, the Earth is Flat.
The Seas are Rising, the Earth is Flat.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- ...
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
- All
Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 20 January 2013 10:14:42 AM
| |
I wonder if this, as with Poirot, will be the result with all warmists?
Will they all just fold their tent, & sneak off into the night, as they realise the error of their arguments, & not want to admit how badly they were taken in by con men & women. Posted by Hasbeen, Sunday, 20 January 2013 10:30:57 AM
| |
Hasbeen,
Not folding tent and sneaking off into night...just have better things to do than argue with the likes of you (it's like a saloon bar around here - with the same level of veracity:). I'll reprise this link - as it says it all quite bluntly... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZdCfoDiMDg Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 20 January 2013 10:50:20 AM
| |
SPQR, I have used the Emperors clothes analogy for decades, and how absolutely true it is in regard to CAGW devotees.
Speaking of fiction, the Global Warming Industry also fits the “Chicken Little” mind set. Chicken Little…“The sky is falling, the sky is falling”. Observer….“THE SKY CAN’T FALL” Chicken Little…..“Then the earth is rising, the earth is rising”. As I mentioned earlier the agenda is to take the pressure to clean up their act off the manufacturers, shift the blame to the consumers, fleece the tax revenue from sovereign nations and create a one way money funnel to the U.N. That is the only part of their agenda that has not changed….everything thing else is elastic. If it is consecutively hot…..it’s GW If its unseasonably cold….it’s GW If there is drought….it’s GW If there are monsoon’s….it’s GW Too much snow….it’s GW Too little snow….it’s GW If little Billy’s nose bleeds….it’s GW Gosh, what can’t GW do…. Posted by sonofgloin, Sunday, 20 January 2013 10:55:20 AM
| |
Belly>>You inadvertently, in saying as you have, explains why you think the twin towers was a set up.<<
Yes china I use the same logic on 911 as I do on most issues. Not on a single occasion has a modern sky scraper been “DEMOLISHED” by a fire. Then we get two that not only demolish, but fall into their own footprint. Not to mention WTC building 7 WTC 7 was not directly hit, yet it was “DEMOLISHED” but at the request of Larry Silverman, the owner. The fire brigade tells him it’s alight and he says “PULL IT”. Then the NYFD “DEMOLISH” the building within an hour. Contract demolition companies take weeks to set up a high rise for demolition. Why do they bother….ask the NYFD how its done in an hour. Silverman must have had too much Prozac that day because he told this ridiculous lie. He has never reaped it or commented on it again…..like it didn’t happen and he did not say it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk Belly, the unbridled construction of sky scrapers in South America from 1970 on saw sub standard insulations and flammable building materials widely used. The fires that eventuated burnt ferociously for days. None of them fell….not one…ever…then we get three within hours of each other. Give me a break….then you have Silverstein blabbing. Nah 911 like the Kennedy murder is an inside job, ask Blind Freddy Posted by sonofgloin, Sunday, 20 January 2013 10:55:55 AM
| |
Poirot,
Just before you duck off could you please check your calculator re the figures I provided ? How many millimetres deep would 1.5 billion cubic metres of water cover when spread out to 361 million square metres ? ps. your link re the greedy oil crowd reminds of the greedy public servants who take as much as they can from those who work. Uncanny parallel. Where're you heading anyway ? Posted by individual, Sunday, 20 January 2013 11:05:05 AM
|
I'm going to stop.....>>
Well, that explains it – your kooky ideas, that is.
Too many hammer blows to the head
Yep! it might be a good idea to stop doing it.