The Forum > General Discussion > Has the RSPCA been highjaqcked?
Has the RSPCA been highjaqcked?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Telling city people to go shoot sheep or take up farming seems hardly relevant to the issue. Surely if you have to move livestock in a hurry it is much easier to do it if they are already packaged and ready for shipment - given that you have had to shoot them anyway.
This notion that the blame always falls back to the consumer is a bit iffy. Sure people want more for less and that is a problem but nothing to do with meat exports.
There is a big domestic market here and if we all shopped locally and bought Australian produce. It seems weird to export meat and other food products only to have to import another country's same products. Bizarre really when you think about it. But protectionism has become a dirty word now, in the next fifty years it will probably be back in vogue when the problems of free trade in an unequal market place come home to roost (pardon the pun).
Still I don't want to digress from Belly's main topic. As far as the RSPCA is concerned they are just doing the job according to their charter which is to prevent cruelty to animals. Simply that - whether one agrees with prevention of cruelty or not.