The Forum > General Discussion > Do we need and inqyuiry in to Union Coruption?
Do we need and inqyuiry in to Union Coruption?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Page 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- ...
- 35
- 36
- 37
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Monday, 17 December 2012 1:56:40 PM
| |
Poirot! the Emperor has no cloths.
And judging by those rants other bits are missing. I am unsure if Thomson will ever face court. Certain if guilty he should go to prison. However this much I can assure you , much of the charges said to be laid against him ARE FALSE. SM can not know just how little he knows, he approaches the subject using verbal inexactitudes. In the end SM has never found fault with any one on his side , but grabs with both LIPS any chance to verbal a Labor person. Poirot you have an IQ that will understand, IF I thought him guilty he would be a target just as much as the maggots I target here in this thread. UNIONS FUND ALP at election time. They fund their own looking for a seat, no crime there. I as union official! have rang in and used the UNION/BRANCH SECRETARY'S GOLD CREDIT CARD. It is not uncommon, Not every official has a card one per branch is the norm. Note SM, INSULTS YOU, HE IS HURTING! and wrong. Posted by Belly, Monday, 17 December 2012 5:27:21 PM
| |
"Note SM,INSULTS YOU..."
Water off a duck's back, Belly (Quack!) Posted by Poirot, Monday, 17 December 2012 5:36:46 PM
| |
Belly,
You might be interested in this tale of a bad loser. http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/mal-brough-and-the-art-of-losing-gracefully/ Posted by Poirot, Monday, 17 December 2012 7:56:57 PM
| |
Poirot,
You are not using the standards of the federal court, you are abdicating your decision making to the court. On your basis, you freely admit that only the three people named in the judgement had anything to do with the case? The rest including Pyne etc are completely innocent. Posted by Shadow Minister, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 4:19:11 AM
| |
Thanks poirot the link was good.
Pyne? he is extremely lucky being a bad mouthed big spiteful kid is not a crime. His behind the scenes meetings with the story's constructor is clear, grubby bloke. We see contributors and the general public say they are WEARY of politics. A dangerous word, and a dangerous thought. So many of us, ever willing to wade in to the waters, give our opinions, are unwilling to follow the events in detail. To turn away from daily reports of filth is to say it really does no matter. Not specifically referring to your problem SM, seeing only evil on my side. But am bound to chuckle most of this day as your spidders web of spin try,s to hide Pyne. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 6:14:22 AM
|
It leaves every room for doubt, for incompetence - and in light of the connection between Jackson and Lawler.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-21.thomson-claims-vindication-after-report-savages-fair-work/4213408
The "standards" I'm applying are the judgment of the Federal Court.