The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Do we need and inqyuiry in to Union Coruption?

Do we need and inqyuiry in to Union Coruption?

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. ...
  7. 35
  8. 36
  9. 37
  10. All
John Dela Bosca say yes and so do I.
A remoteness from the reason unions exist can be found in some unions, members.
Past dirt files and not so far in the past harm the trade union movement.
But most of all the union members.
A worker should be able to pay his or her dues and know it is not to reward filth.
In return they will get service and honestly.
Above all, only a trusted union movement can grow.
And it is in the interests of workers that the better unions do.
Posted by Belly, Saturday, 1 December 2012 5:41:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Won't find much of a paper trail the paper shredders have been working overtime and the verbal witness is probably as corrupt as the person being investigated.
Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 2 December 2012 11:36:42 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We need an inquiry as to why Graham doesn't edit general section articles for typos. This stuff goes up on the National Forum board - goodness knows what newcomers must think.

(Not having a go at you, Belly. I'm a typo maker extraordinaire and we all let them get past at times...I can't understand why Graham can't quality control the headings)
Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 2 December 2012 12:16:23 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Advice may I suggest you use Firefox browser the spell checked should be on by default if not just say so and someone will be able to help turn it on.

MISC - If a person understands what you have written easily that is the main thing, NO ONE IS PERFECT I am sure we can find mistakes in everyone's comments from time to time.

If you turn on the spellchecker at least most of them will be picked up.

inqyuiry shows as an error straight away and has the correct spelling when using Firefox.
Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 2 December 2012 1:53:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Honestly try to read this, you'll be amazed. Donít try and concentrate to work it out ... just read it, totally weird!

cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg.
THE PAOMNNEHAL PWEOR OF THE HMUAN MNID Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Amzanig huh?

p.s. Jeez, the spell-check goes berserk on THIS one!

I liked this one found it a few years ago.
Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 2 December 2012 1:55:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yes, Philip S, I understand all that. I've read stuff like that before - as lnog as the frsit and lsat letetrs are wrhee tehy sholud be, then one can mkee snese of thigns.

...my point was mainly in relation to the titles of general section discussions. Often there are the most horrendous typos and spelling mistakes in the headers. I don't particularly give a toss about the mistakes in the body of the thread, but I'm wondering why the bold-lettered titles are allowed to go through with no corrections.

(sorry, Belly, for derailing, but I've been noting this for a while)
Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 2 December 2012 2:18:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. ...
  7. 35
  8. 36
  9. 37
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy