The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Royal Commission should first investigate Special Commission of Inquiry

Royal Commission should first investigate Special Commission of Inquiry

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All
Sex Rings Reveal The Worst of the Power Elite
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/11/child-sex-rings-reveal-worst-of-power.html

how diabolical the controlling elite really are.

According to Missingkids.com, 800,000 children under the age of 18 go missing each year globally -- 2,185 per day. Their hotline received an average of 580 calls per day to this point in the last quarter of 2012 --

3.5 million calls since the organization's inception in 1984.
It is clearly an epidemic of staggering proportions.

When Fritz Springmeier and David Icke began talking 20 years ago about organized pedophile rings and mind-controlled sex slaves (often with overtly Satanic themes) within the highest levels of society, most readers met them with serious doubt or outright dismissal. We would be very unwise to dismiss their research now.

The Jimmy Savile scandal/it is embedded within Britain's BBC corporate media itself where they were forced to lamely issue an apology that the original Newsnight investigation into numerous claims of sex acts with children was dropped, all the while insisting that "there was not enough evidence to say whether sexual abuse or harassment at the corporation was 'endemic'".

David Icke certainly has a different take on it. According to Icke, Savile "was the child-supplying fixer for the rich and famous in politics, entertainment and royalty" and can be linked to a massive child abuse scandal in North Wales.

(Source) Icke's 1998 book The Biggest Secret details a seemingly unbelievable number of prominent U.S. and UK political leaders who centrally figure into these scandals.

Icke details how Savile is indicative
not of a single evil person using their position of power to destroy innocence..but of systematic abuse.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Gerald_Sandusky_Sexual_Abuse_Findings_of_Grand_Jury.png/800px-Gerald_Sandusky_Sexual_Abuse_Findings_of_Grand_Jury.png
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 15 November 2012 7:03:58 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
TPP this is what I meant.
This country I love, has for generations, failed its children in Church care and others.
This Royal Commission will take nothing less than 2 years, in my view left to run its course more than three.
Just as in Holland America and Ireland, its results will make us cry.
And never be forgotten.
It will take more generations, before your second point, one I am very much aware of, is investigated.
Governments of all colors are never short of white wash.
Right now, if you wanted to I could take you to children in the new care system who are badly miss used.
You know as I do getting action is near an impossibility.
Posted by Belly, Thursday, 15 November 2012 11:32:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Oh gotchya Belly, I just live in hope. Even I can’t get help to stop abuse from the system in place. You get punished if you complain about decisions that hurt children and that punishment can hurt even more children you care about. As always I feel trapped.

I see some other things being rolled out from Govt while this story of the Royal Commission has top billing. Deciding before birth to take peoples children if drugs, DV or alcohol are involved. So while saying the children are not safe in care and all providers need investigating we see them find reasons to make it easier to take more children.

OUG you just went global, I can’t begin to grasp all that yet.
Posted by The Pied Piper, Thursday, 15 November 2012 3:00:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
http://www.smh.com.au/national/imported-priests-pose-risk-church-abuse-inquiry-told-20121109-293ka.html
The link is the peak of a very big very ugly ice berg.
Do not ignore it click the link, read it, shudder as I did.
Know real children who grew in to damaged adults are involved.
Know many died at their own hands.
Know God said *Suffer the little Children to come to me*
Not WHO come to me.
Posted by Belly, Friday, 16 November 2012 12:56:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Gawd, some Bunnings Advert went bezerk on me.

I read the link Belly, it’s horrible.

Salvation Army is setting up a new NSW NGO now to take young people from DoCS. The Catholic Church has been around forever being handed our little Aussies.

I didn’t understand for a long time why the older victims didn’t help put a stop to new victims being created but I think I do get it now. It’s expecting too much from them after all they have been through and continue to go through.
Posted by The Pied Piper, Friday, 16 November 2012 3:50:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
apparently there is to be a consultation[7 day]..to frame 'the rules
so i want to toss a few out there

first its important to put things on permanent record
not keep the findings secret..so item one is a daily searchable transcript[so we know its on the public record.

next i feel establish the record..of all complainants /daily

begin the day with mention of names [before todays justiice
named/known..vicytims..who complain about other named names,before an authoritive court of record.[on the public record..cause we are sick of secrets.!

these 'names initially held back from the public record/online
become public ..on the transcript..once their evidence sworn signed statements..enter the record proper..of the commision..

its the openess..and availability of the names..so others can watch/witness the right thing being done in real time...without secrets..names must be named..[or fully exposed to those whjo may have been affected..

ie all official inquiry..must send off a form letter.
namingthe now exposed vile person..so other victims know[i hate secrets..victims are only told after[thats a huge wrong.

what i want to see
is people able to be going there being heard..asp[that day!..if only for the base facts..allready witnessed and testified in writing
not some vetting service..that keeps people from getting heard!

direct one to one..complain/publicy..
judge hearing orders the issue investigated..confirmed ratified..

then if validated..call back the victim..to formerlise..more detail
into the official PUBLIC written record..on line.
then get back to recording the replies...or whatever.
Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 2:07:30 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy