The Forum > General Discussion > Is Australia a 'torn' nation?
Is Australia a 'torn' nation?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Huntington notes that Australia has been a Western nation since its inception, but under Paul Keating, Australian political leaders decided that Australia should "defect from the West, redefine itself as an Asian society, and cultivate close ties with its geographical neighbors." He then notes the Australian public's antipathy towards the imposition of an alien, non-Western identity and the implacable refusal of Asian leaders to accept a European-derived nation within their region.
Huntington predicts that if this trend continues, Australia will be irreparably torn between its "branch office of empire" heritage and the "new white trash of Asia."
Huntington dubs Australia's delusions as "cultural schizophrenia" and concludes that Australia should seek closer ties with its traditional Western allies, rather than engage in an ultimately deleterious attempt to fundamentally reshape its identity in the futile hope of gaining membership into Asian trade blocs.
In all, Huntington's views regarding Australia's place in the world are highly thought-provoking. I agree with Huntington that Australia does have a major identity crisis. We live in a nation unwilling to teach its history or embrace its Western culture and heritage. Multiculturalism has eroded the nation's identification with Western civilisation, denied a common Australian culture, and promoted ethnic and non-Western cultural identities and groupings.
If demography dictates all, then Australia's declining Anglo-Celtic/European population in combination with high Asian immigration may indeed result in Australia becoming "torn" in several different ways. As the Chinese are reputed to have said: "May you live in interesting times."