The healthy, well-adjusted apes are the most deluded of all.
My favourite piece of animation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9cWkUhZ8n4

Psychiatric Treatment - Does it work ? Is it an effective treatment ?
Only for the Psychiatrists.

G'day INDIVIDUAL...

Yeah, you may well be right ! I can only speak on my own behalf, that's all.

I reckon there'd be millions out there, who wouldn't give a toss, about them (psychiatrist), or their therapy(ies).

Thank you to everyone who were sufficiently motivated to put a view, or share an opinion. A tough topic for some, a joke for others.

Nevertheless, thank you all.

To ONE UNDER GOD...

G'day Mate -

I believe you could (expertly) recount and narrate to us all, such a lot by way of facts, specific data and general information that deals execlusively with issues of government malfeasance, as well as police insensitivity even ignorance.

Previously, I've indicated how sorry I am for what injustices have been occasioned to you and yours, whenever you found it necessary to deal with any of the above.

Being an ex copper, I naturally fall into that target group of your exasperation even wrath. All I can say to you OUG, not every copper is necessarily 'tarred' with the same brush.

It's that small majority, that gives all police a bad name.

Police by virtue of the job, need to occasionally, play 'hard ball' with some people, just a few fortunately. Otherwise the real 'heavies' would walk all over us, and in doing so, walk all over the community as a whole. I'm sure you recognise that ?

Take care of yourself ONE UNDER GOD, and I hope we can speak again soon.

Cheers.

yes it is as it is
thanks for talking..though i was looking forward..to the drug free remedy/meditaion..

i only learned the difference recently
like phychiatrysts..can issue medication
phycologist cant..so that 'drugfree' musy be via phycologist

but if we wish to keep secrets thats fine
i met a lot of good cops..your saying i say all bad is so wrong
i said so many positive things..even thried to join..but was in hindsight glad i was rejected.

i know im being pushy..but im hoping some good comes from all the garbage police heaped on so many..but not white collar

that reveals a level of complicity..your friends revenue raise
steal value..not add values

anyhoe nuthing personal
you got the gun..so to speak..

'espri de gore
and all that..but thats not their fault

not sure you want to know of this stuff i come accross

but here goes

File Attachment:
File Name: Jane-Doe-v-TPSB-1998-SCJ.pdf
File Size: 153 KB
Jane Doe is raped after Toronto police fail to warn her that a serial rapist, later to be known as the “balcony rapist”, was targeting women in a specific neighbourhood. Decision is a precedent setting case for two reasons. Firstly, court finds police breached s. 15 charter rights of Jane Doe and discriminated against her based on gender. Police did not act in accordance with their statutory duty to project the public from criminal activity and they carried out their duty in a manner that discriminated based on gender. Police believed rape myths. Police “adopted a policy not to warn her because of a stereotypical discriminatory belief that as a woman she and others like her would become hysterical and panic and scare off an attacker, among others” (Par 192) Secondly, the court held that liability of the police extends to victims of crime. Police failed in their duty of care to protect Jane Doe. Police do not have a general duty to all victims of crime, but there is sufficient proximity of police to Jane Doe. Police “were aware of a specific threat or risk to a specific group of women and they did nothing to warn those women of the danger they were in, nor did they take any measures to protect them.” (par 162) Although a lower court decision, the essential findings of the case have been upheld by higher courts including the Supreme Court in the Hill v Hamilton Police case (para 125-135).

File Attachment:
File Name: Hill-v-Hamilton-Wentworth-Regiional-Police-Services-Board-SCC-2007.pdf
File Size: 251 KB

http://public.worldfreemansociety.org/media/kunena/attachments/337/Hill-v-Hamilton-Wentworth-Regiional-Police-Services-Board-SCC-2007.pdf

This case finally establishes that police across Canada can be sued for negligent investigation. Prior to this decision, some provinces had not allowed actions against police for negligence.

Police conduct during an investigation should be measured against the standard of how a reasonable officer in like circumstances would have acted. The standard of care of a reasonable police officer in similar circumstances should be applied in a manner that gives due recognition to the discretion inherent in police investigation.

This standard is flexible, covers all aspects of investigatory police work, and is reinforced by the nature and importance of police investigation.

In this case, considering practices at the time, police are found to have meets the standard of a reasonable officer in similar circumstances.