Look, sonofgloin,
You are flat out wrong when you say that the data was manufactured. That alone shows that you've not really thoughtfully assessed what you've been reading.
I think that in an effort to appear unbiased, you have ceased to demand credibility.
Anyway, suit yourself.
I'll go with history. Oh, and all the other scientific bodies I listed in my previous email.
I mean, seriously, you want to base your argument on the "anything's possible" hypothesis?
Oh, please.
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

How amazing that many of the things some scientists predicted decades ago - such as extreme weather events and temperature increases - are coming to pass at just about the time they were expected to.

It wasn't a matter of "look at what's happening" rather than "this is what is expected to happen" - which is rather different.

How easy is it though, for some to dismiss the notion entirely and blame it on nature itself but with no particular explanation or for no other reason than "it's happened before".

The passing of Neil Armstrong didn't cause a resurgence in the alleged "Moon Landing Hoax" conspiracy but no amount of scientific evidence will convince AGW denialists who share some remarkable similarities.

Planet3, overpopulation is certainly an issue, but I believe the NWO has the solution to that problem all mapped out.

The primary difference when comparing overpopulation and climate change is that the former has only been here for the past 60 odd years and unhappily it is escalating. Whereas the climate has been here forever, and managed to sustain a population of some sort or another through periods when the earth is convulsing toxic gases or the cycles of the planet run through freezing and warming.

We are poisoning our environment, our machine made pollution and domestic waste is taxing the eco system like never before. Way back when DuPont went after Rachael Carson she knew who the bad guy was, and he knew it to. Profit over all, zeig profit.

We have all seen the science that can clean up any emission be it gas or liquid. The science exists, but it costs, it is as simple as that.

We have been slipshod and hoodwinked. There is ludicrous pathos in how the focus of blame has moved via the media and the bastards who advise the advisors straight onto the consumer. We will just give the polluter a complete miss.

We don’t legislate for near to zero emissions; we don’t stick a 20% environmental levy on them to move them towards this once off huge expenditure with a lesser ongoing fixed cost , we tax the consumer and carry on polluting. That fixes the problem.

Yes Planet3, you are a dirty little planet at the moment, primarily because the simple souls who inhabit the majority of the first world do not know who their enemy is.

Wobbles>>How amazing that many of the things some scientists predicted decades ago<<

Wobs are you going to start quoting me from the Book of Revelations next:

In the end times there will be trial and tribulation upon the earth
The earth will burn and the winds will blow..etc etc etc.

I still go back to the published “global warming” admissions of fraud by the ones you acclaim as prophets, they were full of it then and still are. They go to the highest bidder, but that is my summation. You can brush this major lie away like the no carbon tax lie from that despicable carcass that calls itself Julia or you can examine the facts.

One fact, there has been no record rises in high tide readings in Sydney harbour over the past 50 years.

There is an 18 year tidal cycle which means that you reach the absolute highest astronomical tide about once every 18 years and that was spread over 2008 and 2009 and the tides were 2cm lower than the previous two cycles.

I will examine the facts for myself, you keep reading the media releases Wobs

Oh dear, what were you going to do with all that ice?

Anthony as well as being right you are up to the task.
I did warn you.
You however are in verbal combat with the folk who rushed down to the beach chair under arm, to observe the coming Tsunami!