The Forum > General Discussion > What's wrong with the pension, & public health?
What's wrong with the pension, & public health?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
all those years ago when the laws of that time
stated that it had to be 14 years of service to
get a parliamentary pension. Kirner was in for 12 years.
The only pension that she's receiving is the super that
she's paid in herself. I guess she hoped that they would
make exceptions in her case as Premier - and the laws
would be changed. They weren't.
Currently she's blin in her right eye and has severe
osteoporosis. Yet she's still contributing to the
Community as she's always done. She currently holds
the position of Victoria's Communities Ambassador -
showing disadvantaged people which buttons to push to
get things done.
Anyway, I am merely expressing my opinion in Kirner's case.
Especially after reading the article - "Howard tops ex-PMs
in perks." which makes me wonder why some get things -
others don't - and the list of benefits the ex-PMs get
is really quite amazing - all funded by the taxpayer.