Dear Belly,

Men in generally are physically stronger than woman and feel they should control everything because they are stronger. However, one thing they can't control is that women are the source of new life. Men invent gods and put words in the mouths of the gods they invent. They make fables about women coming from men's ribs, men being conceived without sex, holy fables about Jesus and Buddha doing without or giving up sex, fables about virginity being somehow holier than having sex, fables about women as seductresses, etc.

Meanwhile women keep having babies, nurturing them and continuing the race.

Men can't control that so they make more fables and more restrictions on women.

Meanwhile with all the nonsense of religious fable and arbitrary rules for women, they continue to be the source of life.

And so it will be.

david/note..""Meanwhile women keep having babies,
nurturing them and continuing the race.""

turning little demons into faux gods
so they can die as a marter*

yeah mums like strong men
and a man fighting a war..isnt here[and this suits her]

"""Men can't control that
so they make more fables..and more restrictions on women.""

who wants to be a drone[raising others child?]
[joseph]..thats a jewish thing..[stepfather's raising not their own]

must keep the holy holy
free of sentimental attatchment

""Meanwhile with all the nonsense,,of religious fable
and arbitrary rules for women,..they continue to be the source of life.""

not so

sure;;they are co-creators]..like god
but man puts a living sperm..[puts the life in]
mother then moulds the man[till he goes off to kill others children]

ahhh men
god gave you the gift of life
but gave to the mother's.. the gift of co creation

adam rejecting god..
for what the beasts got[mating to their sister]

adams rib=father of eve
eve was adams clone[sister]
adam was father..to his daughters/sisters kids

who has the origonal sin son?
the one who rejected god..one to one exclusivly
who didnt tell eve of the living loving lover [god]..good

''the serphant did ask eve..didst god forbid''?
and no god didst forbid adam..but adam forbad eve

she ate an apple of wisdom
his inbred decendants know it not..still

*she is without sin*
[read ya noatide law...[father can forgive a daughter..a foolishness[ditto brothers husbands etc..forgiving sisters wives]..the story is clear..yet they are blind to how god feels

[no death honours the god of life
[thus yes every sperm is sacred..lol
but seed live too ..pollen lives TOO..etc etc

where life is
there is god is good..sustaining it its life

HI Belly,

Thank you for that information, I will check out the ABC and SBS websites. It was good to hear this Muslim lady speak some common-sense-sanity in this world of so much insanity and delusion.

Davidf I share your view, but while thinking all human habits and actions are a result of our evolution remain baffled.
If we look via that evolution we can see too women,as is the case with most life, searched for the best father for their offspring.
Both sex's see some never stop searching.
Even today men want assurance the woman is loyal,often more so than them.
Baffled too, by the understanding religions come in very many shapes and sizes, but we tend to cast off all but the one we follow.
Ignore in fact all others.
Evidence maybe, that man needs to believe,and has invented then re invented God.
I had hope others would focus on why we do need God.
The fact is if you and I on an Island today invented a God, in three generations it would be no longer seen as an invention, hence ww2 cargo cult in our north and many others.
A question needs asking,would this world be better for only haveing one God?

belly/quote..""If we look..via that evolution
we can see too women,as is the case with most life,
searched for the best father for their offspring.""

makes sense
the best lookers get the mating[then the drone raises]
just as much as many men get tempted by the right genes in jeans

""Even today men want assurance the woman is loyal,
often more so than them."""

i used to say to that belly
is men cant pretend..its the wifes kid
but the wife has a drone locked in[she ned simply name some mug..say its yours..and govt sends the sukker a bill or levies his wage

guys cant say to the wife
this is yours..its a huge difference
[we all know the 'fun' guys...are having way too much fun..for a kid

so comein spinner

""Baffled too,..by the understanding
religions come in very many shapes and sizes,
but we tend to cast off all but the one we follow.""

even worse reliions divide into creeds
like watch 'trouble in ammish paridise'
the christs house is very divide..as much as all other scets

""Evidence maybe,..that man needs to believe,
and has invented..then re invented God.""

oh belly..yes SOME..people
like others to tell them what to do/blieve etc
yet others love telling others what they want you to do

if not religious charity
then serving natzie/commie idoligy..[athiest idolitry]

""focus on why we do need God.""

cause we know FOR SURE..science never dun it
only claims to know how..yet cant do it[thus is why god did it]

why we need god..is to do that thing called life
natural/nurture/nature anything..that belongs to god
where life is there is god sustaining it to live..

no god..no-one
to invent..[{0}]..nuthin

""The fact is..if you and I..today invented..*a God,
in three generations..it would be no longer seen..as an invention,""

you got proof of course?

""would..this world/be better..for only haveing..one God?""

thats the real problem[realise belly..inside you is god
we all are god..yet there is only one true life sustaining light sustaining good[the true god]..found by loving others..seeing god..of all]..in all..[omni-present]

doing for the least
is*..doing unto god..[the atonement..the all..[at-one=meant]

Dear Belly,

I don't think we need any gods at all. However, if we must have gods, why limit the number? In the Roman Empire (before it became Christian in the fourth century) when a new group became part of the empire their gods were simply added to the pantheon of gods. There was little intolerance. Some people favoured one set of gods some another. Monotheism increased intolerance. You either follow Jehovah, Jesus or Allah or you're a dirty dog. Only the Jews and later the Christians caused problems with their insistence that their invention was the only god.

In my opinion no gods is most reasonable. Polytheism is liveable and monotheism stinks. Monotheism promotes intolerance. This intolerance has been controlled where there is separation of religion and state.

http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=10725 points to the article I wrote on the beginnings of the separation in the sixteenth century. http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=10790 is my article on the separation of religion and state in the US.
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=10065 is my article on the invention of god.

At this time the High Court of Australia has heard a case calling for the ending of Commonwealth funding for the National School Chaplaincy Program (NSCP) but has yet to make a decision.

It would help if state money would go to state schools and church money would go to church schools. I think parents have a right to send their children to religious schools but do not think taxpayers should finance their decision.

Government funding for religious schools and the NSCP seems to be in violation of S. 116 of the Australian Constitution.