Dear runner,

This isn't about me old chap. It's about the language
you're using and the judgements you're making about
people - which rather surprised me coming from you
who professes to
believe in the teachings of Christ - especially at this
time of the year. It appears that you don't believe in
practising what Christ preaches.

Yes, Hasbeen, I guess one compensation we have is that they are so
incompetent that they would never be able to organise a one world government.

They voted on Bob's motion and the amendment and voted on both, so now
they have two conflicting policies.
At no time did the amendment become the motion and then voted upon.
Apparently Bob's motion is the nondemocratic one.

At no time did the chairman state that either motion was passed.
So, probably they do not have any policy on world government.
So when Bob gives a wide grin and beams that the greens have a world
government policy we can say, "Oh no you don't !"

Well Lexi I am glad at least you give validation to Christ's teachings. That is heartening.

Dear runner,

Bless You.

STOP IT..you two
we need to bring forth our differnces
to get to the core[that core that hurts]

let go our fears..by bringing it on

not being nice
lol

lord what would happen
if everyone was acting like you two...too

toot toot
mute

the vote wasnt ratified
great...or is it

one world govt
one boss telling us what to do

hey that might allow a level of govt to go

lol
only joking
we love the beurocratic leeches sukking our lifeblood dry

Lexi, this is not you?

runner and Hasbeen have introduced what I think are valid perspectives. OUG is also presenting some balance. What is it about the current socio-political stand-off that provokes so much in the way of “out of character” responses?

If the Green agenda is taking us away from our core beliefs and values, does this not speak more to the Greens distortions rather than our traditional and well supported values?

Lexi, your posting history tells us much about YOU. It is an admirable you. Likewise there is a long history of runner, Hasbeen and Bazz style responses. We all know who and what you are. So, why do you have to defend who and what you really are?

Is it possible that a radicalization has been provoked by those who seek to “split the difference”?

I am not comfortable with an OLO environment where regular posters feel the need to shift or justify their perspectives left or right to accommodate dysfuncionality, ideology or radicalism. We should all stand by what we stand by. That is what makes us all who we are, and you Lexi, are Lexi.

I doubt anyone on OLO would feel comfortable with Lexi being “other than Lexi” because you are a reference point.