The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > How many more ladies?

How many more ladies?

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
I'm a bit bored, it's too peaceful, so I thought I'd ask the question.

How many more ladies will it take to finally kill off the Oz Labor party?

Now we all saw that it took only 4 lady leaders to kill the Oz Democrats, but they were of course a somewhat smaller party.

We have seen every single lady Labor leader preside over a huge loss of support by the electorate.

Anna was the only one who could claim to have been elected by popular vote, & look what she did to that in just 3 years.

Julia on the other hand used a few whiles to get to the lodge, but looks as if she will manage to beat Anna in leading Labor in the rush to oblivion.

Before the Qld elections there had been 5 ladies, all of whom managed to reduce Labors popularity quite quickly, so why have they done it again?

This morning I listened to a very supportive ABC interview of their new lady leader, Palaszczuk, & wondered if they have a death wish. She appears to be trying to be twice as tough as Anna, but with only half the capacity.

One of her big bitches was the lack of female cabinet members in the new LNP government. Interesting that. Perhaps they don't have a death wish, like the one Labor appear to be continuing with her Promotion to leader.

Yes I know, I'll duck.

PS. Right now the ABC have a bunch of birds on air, scrambling all over this lack of "fair" representation. Surely it is bad enough that cabinet ministers have to be selected by the regions they represent, with out having to worry about their sex as well.
Posted by Hasbeen, Monday, 2 April 2012 10:52:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Amusing post, I spent most of yesterday pondering how societies such as the U.S.A and the U.K whose whole political landscapes are totally dominated by minority interests and underpinned by egalitarian principles are now even more rapacious, warlike and imperialistic than the so called White male hegemony of the past.
We call it Totalitarian Humanism.
Remember Feminist teachers who'd puff themselves up by saying that if women ran the world there'd be no more war?
The Western powers are now stacked with feminists of both sexes and the great Liberal Panzer Divisions are rolling over the Third World.
What went wrong?
Could it be that Feminism and all the other egalitarian "Isms" were set up to serve Globalist Captialism in the first place?
You could also look at it from the MRA perspective, the women now have power, which has come at the expense of men's human rights, don't expect us to help you out if it all goes pear shaped, we're all too busy playing video games and dying of preventable diseases.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Monday, 2 April 2012 11:46:50 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Interesting concept.

Are the female ALP leaders getting the leadership in a hospital pass? Did labor always expect Juliar to fail and hoped that the feminist vote would prevent a bloodbath?

First Keneally, then Bligh, and now Juliar are going to leave office with only a handful of MPs.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Monday, 2 April 2012 12:44:56 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Margaret Thatcher was obviously promoted on ability and delivered what most men could not. The Labour party appoints political animals whether men or women. Look at their last 3 choices.
Posted by runner, Monday, 2 April 2012 12:59:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I would have thought that the record of female
politicians is just as varied as their male counterparts
and demonstrates the impracticality of using gender to
differentiate between leadership styles
Posted by Lexi, Monday, 2 April 2012 2:26:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Oh I don't know about that Hasbeen.

I am sure we could find far more dropkick male politicians in our colourful political history than we could females.

I very much doubt that more females in the parliament could do a worse job than many of the male politicians over the years.

Oh, by the way Hasbeen, I was bored the other day, and came across a few quotes that I found amusing:

"Women belong in the house... and the Senate." ~Author Unknown

"There never will be complete equality until women themselves help to make laws and elect lawmakers." —Susan B. Anthony

"I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough."
~Clarie Sargent, Arizona senatorial candidate

"There are very few jobs that actually require a penis or vagina. All other jobs should be open to everybody." ~Florynce Kennedy
Posted by Suseonline, Monday, 2 April 2012 10:32:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy