Labor has lost the plot. That's all there's to it. period!

Sorry, Spindoc, but as usual, you've got it wrong again in your use and interpretation of statistics.
Also, there's nothing clever in selectively and thus misleadingly, quoting me, as anyone who reads your post can go back and see what I really said.
Right there you demonstate an only passing acquaintance with the truth.
By cutting out a few of my words and assigning a different meaning to the one I intended, you are, what is it again?
Oh, right, spin doctoring.
A standard right wing ploy, commonly used as a substitute for policies.
But do keep trying. The law of averages says you will get something right, for the right reasons, someday.
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

Anthonyv you will gain no ground with spindoc, others however are even more lost.
This I know, in power Abbott will earn the enmity of many who praise him here.
This worst government ever has been thrown at Whitlam, and indeed Fraser.
We will see much the same said about Conservatives.
At least three years, of challenging conservatives to reflect on their party's faults, unanswered.
Any one truly think they have none.
Today Abbott promised to cut education and health, as have the Republicans.
He proposes cuts to pensions and welfare, but both? both? a tax cut and a new tax for business?
To fund welfare for the well of.
Abbott wants more for private schools less for public.
He talks steel industry death but will not support it or the motor industry.
Doctor No has no idea of economics, yet will not address his 70 billion black hole.
Some power the pro Abbott machine on nothing more than news papers and shock jocks tell them.
Individual would have to goggle it to find out who the shadow treasurer is big shadow too.

Anthonyve, I love it.

So my obtuse friend, where did I previously <<as usual>> get it wrong?

What use and interpretation of statistics did I get wrong?

Where precisely did I <<selectively>>, <<misleadingly>> (is that a real word?) quote or misquote you so that we can all go back and see whatever it was you think you said but have not actually pointed to?

What does “a passing acquaintance with the truth mean”? I know what it meant when Julie Bishop said it in parliament last week. (And you thought we would be impressed didn’t you?)

What words of yours did I cut out? What reassignment of “meaning” did I apply to any quote you made?

If this was, as you suggest, “a standard right wing ploy”, what would a “non-standard right wing ploy” look like? What earned me the tag of a right winger? And why would I personally need a “policy” when I’m not a politician? If I’m not a politician and don’t need to present a policy, why would I need a substitute for a policy?

You see, you said so little yet you raised so many questions. Is it not time that you at least started to think before you write? Or is ready, fire, aim part of your ideology?

Oh dear, spindoc,
So many questions from you, so much educating for you to undergo.
Honestly, I just don't have the time for such a mammoth task.
And I suspect it would be a lost cause anyway.
As to why I would naturally conclude that you're a right winge? Obviously, my dear chap, from your user name. How else?
Dead giveaway.
Cheers,
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

Oh Dear Anthonyve,

So, we are not worthy of a response from your great intellectual eminence as you don’t have the time for plebs such as OLOers?

So what precisely are OLOers to make of the next time you post here?

I guess we must just accept that you are not here to justify in any way, anything you might proffer in the form of the intellectual crumbs you may deign to post.

I take great delight in seeing those who profess some intellectual skills, stand on the end of the garden rake as the handle smacks them in the gob.

More please, you are really funny, embarrassing but funny.

You really should start your own blog. That way you can say what you want and not get challenged. You could call yourself ……er, let me think now? Ah, yes, how about Walter Mitty?