The Forum > General Discussion > Adventures in getting on line
Adventures in getting on line
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by Yuyutsu, Monday, 13 February 2012 1:51:30 PM
| |
Good on you Belly, though not always agreeing with you, I
always enjoy reading your threads ! Occasionally, commonsense seems to evaporate with the odd correspondent herein, who seeks to enlighten us all with their intellectual mastery. Great to see you back, Belly ! Posted by o sung wu, Monday, 13 February 2012 3:36:32 PM
| |
I offer this thought, if the kid we all distrust, every village has one.
Takes the bike from the kid down the street, we get a little upset. If it is our bike,or our child's, we get very upset. I recommend we try to look at every issue from every side. I think, not sure,John Howard may have funded my old connection. It cost me $29.90 a month. I pay that now,for fast INTERNET wireless. And my home,while in a village is far from out back. It is not a rort, one day while on community service, Radio involved, visitors asking questions,informed me of what they had under this scheme. 3 weeks after I had it. We, those folk that day, about 2 hundred more, have seen technology over take us. 2 big telecoms plus patchy smaller ones, can cover us,with help. It surprised me,go into any store any supplier, not one can help, or even wants to, with external aerial advice. The money is in suburban average consumers. Wireless can,and will cover up to 5% of the NBN. I understand the disquiet with NBN. Can we revisit the bycle? As a road worker,I found my self frustrated,we built bridges that, just in my time, had to be widened,often. Why not build for the future?" Just in my lifetime, TV was introduced, valve wireless replaced by so very much. Not in support of Gillard, or her Lemmings, the NBN is a unifying thing. Giving all Australians a service we now depend on, one day it will, looking back, be seen for what it is not who implements it. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 14 February 2012 4:13:02 AM
| |
good tasee ya belly
i know how much you read the papers but i thought..you should know...they..*source news..from outside not inhouse..but outhouse...that cccrap that passes as new...sss much the same as bbc has confessed..it-self..to be doing ie prints spin..as news please read it belly http://theintelhub.com/2012/02/13/state-sponsored-propaganda-bbc-caught-in-the-act/ love to hear ya thought Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 14 February 2012 9:06:06 AM
| |
OUG I read far more than newspapers and have a built in radar for the product you talk about.
I could, for hours defend my thoughts on the value of high speed communications and the net. As a ham radio person , just over the last 15 years, I have had far less use for my extensive radio equipment to help others. Mobile phones first the net second now does that, for some. I ask this, should regional or very remote Australians not have it because of costs? Then do we with draw health care education a host of other things too? Is regional development still our wish. Or do we drive folk back to the city's. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:24:59 PM
| |
Religion is used by the elites as a tool to enable their wars.
Arjay, That's what's written between my lines. Posted by individual, Tuesday, 14 February 2012 11:20:16 PM
|
Now that you have yours, for which I am very happy, and so I hope will the rest of you out there in far country, will you please allow us, city and suburb people who are in an utterly different situation, to choose the type of service we want ourselves rather than having those copper wires that work and serve us very well, forcibly taken away by decree?