Philo and Runner, I was just wondering if you could clear something up for me?

I once asked a nun how mankind was propagated from just the two 'first' human beings, Adam and Eve.
I was always told that brothers and sisters (Adam and Eve's kiddies) couldn't make babies together?

The nun gave me a good slap, and told me to go away!

So, how did we end up with the human race starting from this first 'marriage', and not from evolution, as is the far more believable method?

Banjo, Shadow Minister, I am content to hold my ground and opinions.
Banjo first I from the same childhood as you am no Gay.
They are however as human as you and I .
It is wrong, forever, that based on shrinking religions beliefs, show me another reason, we continue to control others.
History tells us it was our religion born out of the Jewish one, that gave birth to the hate against those we call Gods chosen.
SM understands, some may not, the issue he fights on.
He will not admit great achievements,any combined move here is that,
Decry the NEGATIVITY, indeed careless handling of truth by his lost tribe.
A factory floor exist some place, full of Abbott's non core promises, his written statements, and those made on the run.
His government is doomed already so very many non core even more unachievable.
Honesty once meant far more to us.

Susi you can not be serious. You write

'So, how did we end up with the human race starting from this first 'marriage', and not from evolution, as is the far more believable method?'

No thinking person can believe a fish jumped out of a pond and then back in and then back out and then became a land animal. Evolution is a fairytale. Far more logical that Adam and Eve had intercourse, had a number of children and those children inter married. ONly the very gullible believe the evolution myth.

Runner my friend, you are totally wrong. Here in Queensland ( the land of true thinkers )....we have a transitional fish which I think I just discovered (highly unlikely)..but my children and myself went under the Mantra Resort in Hervey bay, and while on a parent sea life discovery (ages 11 to 14)....we found by looking under some rocks, and to our astonishment, there was this little fish living at the high tide mark.....and this runner is what we found.

There was no water keeping it alive?

Q....what was that fish doing out of water?.....and why was it alive with the amazing ability to jump when disturbed?...true the environment was damp, but NO water to achieve the O2 that salt water gives all but just a few.

I myself have never seen anything like it......but it lives high about water under rocks with only the moisture that high tide left it.

I swear!.....its only 1 inch long, with the incredible ability to flick up to 1 meter.

Care to explain that runner, or will you just run away as usual?

This fish creature lives.......how:)

CACTUS

No Runner, I'm afraid I would far rather believe in evolution than what you are suggesting!
So you believe the human race was founded on incest?
Why has incest been so taboo since the beginning of time then?
Any children born of incest are far more likely to be malformed or intellectually handicapped.
You can't be serious?

Susi

YOu sum up the belief of evolutionist

'No Runner, I'm afraid I would far rather believe in evolution

You would rather because it means you are accountable to a Creator if you acknowledge the obvious rather than some pseudo science fiction. At least you admit you would rather. That does not change the obvious and sums up the idiotic evolutionary belief system.

You are right that incest leads to a higher probability of deforminity. That is why God forbid it after a few generations. You are the one that can't be serious. Just read Cactus justication for believing evolution. You guys sure do have a lot of blind faith.