sorry lexie
i asumed you had more age to enjoin with ya wisdom
but not in this case it seems

ok i should check
for thick fingering before posting
[often i aim at the '0'...and hit the 'io'..or 'oi'

thus what was mean-t to be...to
becomes toi..[or tio]

and that does complicate my intention to gayness
[im meaning...in trying to ex-plain my under/standing of gay
as to mean...not my love of men..but my love of gayness....darn i dun it again]

i mean to say not in anmy mean way
that i mean not that i am licking..
[or is that liking..to lick men..except in a fair fight
but am aslso pre-paired to take my liking[or likking;..even kicking
if kinking is overdue]

im stil not comming a cross
as clear as i would have hoped dear

what i mean is im happily married to my gaynes
yet still cant come out and say im gay and happy too

but dont take this to mean that im happy
just gay

[and the happ*illy married thing
was more a hope than a reality..[or maybe just an expectation]

and no...know im not expecting

nor expectant..just trying to help keep the surity
that if im tall-king with a bloke..and what he done to his spouse

im just seeing that spouse word as deserving
as happy...but not gay

not exclusive to gay
[funny enough my estranged 'spouses name']

but lets try to keep this light
that gay wears too heavilly on me

i know im going in too deep
and will try a more slow stroke on my key bored
i was not trying to drive home my pointers..or indeed even my point

just stating that we have had too many changes..allready?
and while im fine forcing myself to be appearing gay when im not
im not content that two happy and gay guys...
get acclaim to happyness..

when i know it isnt marr-rage
that makes happyness..but only a loving live-in spouse

im not hyper ventilating
nor playing with my mouse
but its good i finally found out
by these marriage topics..how to spell out the marriage mirage

anyhow i need a quick shower now
for some reason im all hot and botherd
marriage topics can be as sad as the real thing

i wouldnt wish...the curse of marriage
on anyone..who claims to be gay

the words dont go two/get-her

ps thanks for the kind words constance
one of mankinds highest consistancies..[qualities]

its a great name
you wear it well

as for dodo only time will tell

I have to repeat my post on page 6 of this discussion, which remains unanswered by our respected opponents:
"I have never ever suggested that the individual's rights should be prioritized over the rights of society. Neither have I suggested that the rights of society should always prevail over the rights of the individual.
There are areas of human life where the rights of the individual must have priority (they called human rights). There are areas of human life where the rights of society must have priority over those of the individual. Intelligent balance between these priorities is a strong indicator of how society is developed.
Equality before the law (regarding marriage too) is universally accepted as fundamental human right, which must have priority over the rights of society.
It is also worthy to notice that every individual should have equal rights. Precisely because if this, these rights cannot be endless and unlimited. No particular right of any individual must threaten or damage any other rights of any other individuals.
However, I cannot see how widening of the legal status of 'marriage' in order to include here the same sex union could threaten or damage any other rights of any members of society?
Maybe, the opponents of this view could provide some practical examples of potential damage they are worrying about?"

andreas..you ask for the damage
men marrying men could possably do
[and thats a fair question]

see my spouse dont mind me spending time with 'the boys'
[does yours mind you spending time with the boys?
or do you mind your spouse es boy time?

ok how about the mens club
no woman allowed..because boys will be boys
usually not physicly loving each other but no doudt trying to?

ok how about that group of men[wearing dresses]
you know..the clergy...how ya think they must feel with that homo grouping..[will they have to marry christ as the nuns do?]

remember the bible is strict on exclusion of woman..pre their sacred rituals..[but note that dont exclude men]

also there is the issue of no sex before sport
i think that rugby player rukking each other up is a thing that neds a firm hand...[that man scrumming rukking thing could get out of control]

would the contest be better
or worse if they married each other

mate im not down on ya...[just know this]
as i said im happy you found love
but love has nuthin to do with marriage

[you will recall forced marriages
to unite family dynasties..or the royal kind/queen thing

and underage marriages...
so is peda/marriage a good thing?
its their right?

lets look at soul matings..[not asoul mate]
but soul mates can include many sexual types
thats whjat i really want to be writing about
[that and reincarnation..but i cant get the topic up

look there are many more reasons
but you got this thing in your mind..you want the wedding thing
to show the world your now spouse and spouse...mzzzz and mzzzz..

[yeah i know hushband and hushband sounded too much
even for you

but bride and bride..
mate thats a boys club fantacy

anyhow i would say your pushing it uphill

but dont want to get into the shhh[crap]..for saying simple truisms

personally i rekon go the name change/formal weeding thing

in its classic way
ie two less/being..[or is that lessabian]..
marries with two male homo gay person'..get the paper..!

do a wife swap
EXchange names...
photoshop the weeding photos..and bobs your unkle

only on paper you wont be unkle bob..but aunt tilly

see andreas
its only too easy

personally if i wanted my lovers oath in weriting
i would be content..to have her swear on a bible

do you believe in the afterlife?
cause you will love the gay heaven..

[not a woman within cooeee]..
just men...all men...all gay

if you like em married..or boyish
or manish mate..its great
[on paper]..

its hushband swopping like you never knew
wife swapping was a thing that sounded better..than the reality

couldnt get anyone to swap their's for mine

anyhow...dont take life so seriouass
enjoy what belesings..god has allready given the pair of you
you found each other once...you dont need a paper to prove nuthin..

go with the simple things
dont let govt into your life

[your not a govt agent provocateur are you?]
they sell us dreams..then when we swallow..they turn on the gas

Andreas Berg'
Are families able to teach their children that homosexuality is an unnatural act?
Are Churches able to read to their congreations letters of Paul like Romans 1:26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.
Ro 1:27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
Ro 1:28 Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.
Ro 1:29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,
Ro 1:30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
Ro 1:31 they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless.
Ro 1:32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.