The Forum > General Discussion > Can we discuss matters of race any more on OLO?
Can we discuss matters of race any more on OLO?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Page 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 10:12:54 AM
| |
Hey, can we get the discussion back on track? It's par for the course that Ammonite is going to be snarky with me. I try, not always successfully I will admit, to ignore it.
BTW, I'm surprised that no-one has picked-up on the fact that Larissa's father's new partner, Roberta Sykes, had a serious case to answer about her purported aboriginality, as her mother said she was the daughter of a US Negro http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobbi_Sykes. So the syndrome that Bolt alludes to does exist. However, I'm not convinced that it necessarily has anything to do with money. My older three children have an aboriginal great great grandmother which was only found out in the last ten or so years. I remember my older daughter asking me whether this made her an Aborigine, which surprised me as I pointed out to her she was much more Scottish, English and Irish, with a bit of Dutch and Italian thrown in. I've wondered ever since why the question even arose in her mind, and while I'm not sure even now, I think it has something to do with an attitude in society from those who are racist that any amount of non-European blood "tars" you. So perhaps the trend of identifying as Aboriginal, even when it is only a small part of your racial heritage, is a reaction against that. Posted by GrahamY, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 10:21:25 AM
| |
Sorry :( I should have also said, thanks for defending me. I appreciate it. :)
Posted by GrahamY, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 10:22:21 AM
| |
Graham,
It's nice to be appreciated. But I thought the whole purpose of the discussion was Andrew Bolt. Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 10:38:36 AM
| |
ab/origonal...inhabiting or egsisting
in a land..from the earliest times or from before the arival of colonists from ab ori..'from the beginning' jew a member of a people who trace their ORIGONS..to judea we are all aborigonal..[from somwhere] we are not all from judea but do all come from eve adam gave us living sperm eve gave us a living egg god breathed life into adam adam gave his dna..[minus that 'y' chromosone]..to eve] life from life god lives thus we live the first people here.. use a capital A and a capital B let A=adam..[Xy]..and B=eve[XX] the AB/origonal and the judean origonal both use the rite and by the rite claim the right but we are all equally gifted our life from the one SAME good..[god] we are ALL..mortal heirs..[enjoined] of the IMMORTAL holy spirit.. [the good [god]..of life logic love and light] logus the AB origonal or the judea/origonal is splitting heirs..we all can claim origonalisty wether it be AB-origonality or J-orogonality ot B-origonality or origonality is inherited equally now race is a different issue its a race to the bottum any who judge of race have no personal claim..any higher than any other claim in fact any claim to race is lame god made creation we changed creation but my peoople tell me *WE ARE A PART OF THE LAND[creation].. just as your hand is a part of your body we are equal's..not under law..[cause mainly law id for just/us] we are nnot equal under law but by right..[god given right] lets try to be the people the god good of grace and generosity and gregriarity deserves after all he serves EACH of us..our life why are we are not..what he DE-serves? Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 11:20:18 AM
| |
Gee I wish we could separate Bolt and the issue of the ruling, and its impacts.
And it would be great to know how many Australians could add to my true story. Even better if we actually saw some action on it. But I ask too much Ammonite, my regards, I was getting a complex about my inability to get on with you. No doubt my views on this issue reserve a special spot in hell for me. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 12:20:49 PM
|
Such reactions - even in French, no less.
"Un jour, je ne le prendrai pas faire marche arriere!"
Take it easy folks.
Graham,
You stated that I'm not interested in arguing with
you because I'm wrong. Really? Well I guess you
think that, because you're convinced that you're right.
Ok. Therefore there's really not much more to be said is there.
I'm wrong, you're right. I based my opinion on presented
facts and judgements by Larissa, Bolt, the judge,court
transcripts,
and if those facts are not correct according to you,
then I guess that does make you the authority.