Julia Gillard and her Govt is not only to embarassment to themselves but to the whole of Australia in the international arena.Everything that they touch,turns to poison.

Julia Gillard talks to the eclectorate like an infants headmistress addressing 5 yr olds.She is totally divorced from reality and constantly makes decisions that hamper our national security and productivity.

My daughter probably echoed the sentiments of many women,"Why did she have to be our first female Prime Minister?" Julia for many women was an utter disappointment.

Why has our country such a low standard of politician? It is not just a matter of money.Quality people have higher aspirations than just amassing wealth and power.There used to be a much more noble and deeper aspiration of wanting to advance the public good as in the Jack Lang era.Now we have public/private contracts that seem to milk the tax payer even more.

We as tax payers are obiviously not getting value for money,

but arjay/mate...what else can be expected from juliar
the moralising athiest..who passes laws on those her mates dont like

like fathers..getting 1200 for two weeks paternal leave
[the carrot]..with the stick i mentioned at bellies topic
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4680&page=0

that refers to that other topic
[re them fathers affected by the OTHER bits of the carrot
to wit the stick]..the media ISNT TAL:KING ABOUT

ie clever spin
selective popularism
expressing the homo hate of fathers
and the moralising of an unwed athiest not mother

yesterday i noted it allready has 75 posts?
today it runs 10 pages

[all fathers
AFFECTED by the stick UNDER THE CARROT!]

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12558&page=0

the initial aerticle was this one
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=12558

but i had to pass on reading them
been there done that

but then
I READ THE NEWS LAST NIGHT..and ONLY heard ONLY of the carrot

ie NOT THE OTHER SIDE
ie those
NOT represented by govt..of any level

it all relates

they wanted more woman in the two party parlement

[as you know they are loyal...to the party line...
as well as easilly sold to green things..

and fighting off them horrible men..
yet bailing out the true basssturds bankers/miners

that made their lives hell..

men like you and me
that are too opinionated
and must be ignored and oppressed at all levels

cause to an unwed homo greenie..and a not a mum
[numb]..we all look the same

ie must be ignored and cast out
and thats how it is

edited

i hope im strong enough not to buy anymore we acces
no dodo..no posting..that will make them feel better

even if it makes me feel worse

im over giving a damm
run out of things i care to explain
to ignorants with carrot/stick by spin adgendas..

only upon those
allready over abused..

and too busy
trying to pay the EXTRA costs
to give a dammm..to the damm spin..anymore..evermore

she hasnt lowerd fem assperations
she is fullfilling athiest/moralistic homo green asssperations
by spin and name calling and extra taxes..for the young fathers

then generouse bailouts
and subsidy for the ol boys club

While excepting Ajay's right to his opinion I will try to put some balance in to a subject that needs exploration.
Gillard before Rudd, even before her rise in the Parliament ,was a far different person.
Once of the true left, she fought in her legal role for workers in need.
She was tough and hard, respected by her faction the left.
Beginning her rise in Parliament she had guts and fire, she had ability's too.
She may have fell for the fraud that was and is, Mark Latham, joining that gang of miss fits Him, Crean, and Fitzgibbon, she switched sides left to right.
She remained a tough street fighter and once, not now, trounced Abbott in the house.
Gillard won power, nothing will ever convince me, ever, she was not in part a reason for Rudd's failures.
I said, often,she can not be trusted.
Today remaining of that younger Gillard is the toughness, but it works against her.
She, even now is saying she is the only one to lead, and she did not eat that humble pie.
She DID NOT LIE! she never knew a hung Parliament would come.
BUT SHE NEVER SAID sorry!
To eat that pie before her,even if baked unfairly, would have killed the lie used against her.
Both Bishops, are as unloved, maybe more, but Gillard, like them, is not killing womens chances of leading us.
Any look will see Julia's strength, is her weakness, men wanted that sorry, men will not vote for her, and for a time, not forever the majors will not risk a female candidate, but we will again have a female Prime Minister.

Is Arjay saying a female PM should reflect female ideals. I say she is tough as iron, and why shouldn't she be. A court decision dosen't change her toughness. Now Abbott wants to be friendly, at the same time saying the court decission doesn't effect Naru. Maybe these gatecrashers should be processed here, under our conditions, and then deported, to their last port of call.

Arjay, it's not just Gillard. The whole EMILY's List crew have damaged the credibility of any future female parliamentarians, especially on the ALP side. Hardly surprising, considering the reason they were selected was to do with their ideology rather than their competence.

We have long accepted that ALP members will come from the Union leadership and this continues. However, as blue collar unions lose membership and power, the white collar unions are gaining it, especially the various public sector unions. These unions are dominated by women and the women are universally members of EMILY's List. As a result, gender has become a central issue in all sorts of discussions that have little to do with gender. Funds are diverted to female services that should be used to fund services for men that have a much higher demonstrable need, in areas such as healthcare and education.

The 8 year gap in life expectancy between men and women has not been addressed in any significant way and is never on the table for discussion.

Of course, Family Law and child Support are redistributive mechanisms designed to maximise the take from fathers to pay for mothers who no longer want to be with the fathers. The concept of mutuality of responsibility is anathema to those who have spent their whole adult life as cosetted Princesses of preferment.

As long as female Parliamentarians see themselves as women first and Australians second, they can never be anything but problematic. The ability to see issues from more than one side is a fundamental one and something that is not possible for our current crop of affirmative actionistas.

579" I say she's tough as iron." You mistake toughness for stubborn stupidity.Julia might have a good memory but her cognitive disconsanance knows no bounds.

David Pembethy reckons her forced resignation will bring on an election because the independants have their agreement with her.Are these agreements in writing or based on a handshake.Would not such an agreement be made involving all of Caucus?

We have to bring on an election before the CO2 tax is implemented since I don't trust the Coalition either.This all all about corporate control of our Govts.10% of the CO2 tax is to go to the UN for their world Govt.Did we vote for that?