With Merkel, Cameron, Sarkozy and Howard all saying multiculturalism has failed, obviously these countries need a new social policy. What will it be?

And what, in God's name, is Cameron's "muscular liberalism"? How can you force someone to be free?

Sarkozy
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2011/0212/1224289636274.html
Merkel
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11559451
Cameron
http://www.news.com.au/world/multiculturalism-policies-in-britain-a-failure-says-pm-david-cameron/story-e6frfkyi-1226000767708
Howard
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/howard-hails-unity-in-return-to-culture-wars/story-fn59niix-1225942454182

What comes 'after' should be obvious :)

"CITIZINSHIP" A program of re chaneling all funding AWAY from any group or process which is in any way supporting, enhancing, applauding, underlining..."DIFFERENCE"

MC by nature is racist. It suggests that newcomers to our country are superior in culture to us. If not...why would they not wish to embrace out country 'as it is'? After all...they chose to come here.. knowing what it's like....OR....."did they"? PERHAPS....

They came here with the idea of growing their own sub culture, separate society and when strong enough.. to completely transform and rebuild our country along lines more compatible with 'their' culture.

One great DANGER of separate groups in our society is when a trigger event occurs..where the mainstream is one one side and the minority is on another.. this could lead to riots, street blood baths and what not.

Take it or leave it.....

multi-culturism is a buzz/word
its a vehicle to gainer support behind one or other of the main parties... [who sell a local member ..as their hero]..saviour

its about personalisation of their resquers..
for political empowerments
who gave them the promised land

but its more
its about dividing and conquering
its about highlighting our difference..rather than our simultude

its about instaling nationalism
in lue of traditional vieuws and values

its a lot more..
inid-genus means sans culture
[we are all AB-origonal ;holding our own cultures]

but we will only get sidetracked
into the other issues

what comes after..is no doudt the me me thing
[if your not in a group..not classified within your peers
then your an individual ..in lue-of.. being a clone]

there will be other forms of group think
queenslanders vs the cockroaches type thing

why does anything need to come 'after' multi-cultrure
it can only be its inverse mono-culture anti-culture.. individualism

we are all ab-origonal..[from some place]
in affect we essentially are made ..strangers in a strange land
govt tries to tie us into class-if-i-cations..

but in the end ..its only how we class-ify ourselves
no more them or us look for the me ..hidden in we

Me
...
We

Multiculture is an idea promoted by those who believe Australia's - democratic free - Judeau-Christian culture is of little value to them and desite another culture to become dominant in Australia. Unless people assimilate they will conflict or dominate an existing free culture. It forms social divisions that borders usually isolate; but trying to coexist in the same borders results in conflict. No amount of goodwill will stop conflict, and putting all in one big melting pot with different values only breeds cultural friction.

Take an example: What is the position and role of women in the culture?

Multiculturalism is a phylosophy that rates original culture ahead of national loyality.

A form of social engineering that has failed.

What should follow now is integration.

It as taken the politicians a long time to realize this.

Now let us see if the polys have the guts to put their words into action. I somehow doubt it.

One under god:

Just to build a bit on your “priority tag”;

God
---
Christianity
---
Other religions
---
We
---
Me.