The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Edward Bernays.. dead.. but alive ?

Edward Bernays.. dead.. but alive ?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All
Dear AGIR,

You wrote; "CSTEELE.. your post is unworthy of a response."

Are you going to tell 400 rabbis their letter is unworthy of a response too?

I understand how much you have invested in glorifying Glenn Beck and how hard would be for you to think ill of him. It is evident this reverence has blinded you to the truth of the man.

Mmm, Beck - Anti-christ?
Posted by csteele, Saturday, 29 January 2011 9:19:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear CSTEELE... yes :) because Beck regularly has a RABBI on his show.

'400 rabbi's' is CLASSIC Bernays psychoanalitical technique.

Also....I hold "400 rabbi's" in utter contempt when they try to shut down a voice of freedom and truth.. remember this.. (read it in full please..for your own benefit)

"How Jewish is hollywood" which includes reference to

-Wall street.
-Mainstream media.
-Hollywood.

Written, of course by a proud Jew :)

(you can't make this stuff up)

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column

News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish).

He mentions that ABE FOXMAN of the ADL saying that mentioning such things could incite ill feeling towards Jews.

THEN..he says:

//I appreciate Foxman's concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.//

Please note THIS bit...

"That's a very dangerous phrase,(says Foxman) 'Jews control Hollywood.' What is true is that there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood," he said. Instead of "control," Foxman would prefer people say that many executives in the industry "happen to be Jewish," as in "all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish."

Stein was simply showing the ludicrous nature of Foxman's approach.

Foxman was triumphally saying "Only 22% of americans now believe Jews control Hollywood" etc. Stein corrected that misinformation.
Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Sunday, 30 January 2011 8:17:26 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear CSTEELE.. I am quite objective about Beck.

When he started on his 'Mormon' history of Hebrew writing in the Smithsonian..I immediately wrote to correct him :) I know the difference between truth and falsehood.... because I never NEVER take Becks word alone. I do actually invessssstigate things myself....independantly. Do you ?

The value of a program like Beck's is this

a) He has a TEAM of researchers.
b) He tells the stories "in their own words" (you can argue with hearsay but not THEYsay)
c) He provides sources.

"CENTURY OF THE SELF" in various parts on Google vids or youtube.(NOT done by FOX, but by the good old left wing BBC)

Study Freud/Reich and their daughters war.

EST movement (Werner Erhard)
ESALEN INSTITUTE. (Reichian psychology)

"HISTORY OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS" same.

Follow this little juicy one

AL GORE shareholdings.. companies he controls.. how they are linked... how they benefit from 'Green' anything.

MAURICE STRONG..

a) Promoter of Eath summit Rio.. and Copenhagen

b) Director of the CHICAGO CLIMATE EXCHANGE! (carbon trading)

Old son..if you cannot see what's going on ... I feel for ya :)

2+2 still equals 4 in 'my' world.
Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Sunday, 30 January 2011 8:27:08 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Al is "objective"

Because he "invessssstigates"

That's hilarious
Posted by Shintaro, Sunday, 30 January 2011 8:46:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Just one more word on "Fortrose-gate", Boaz.

>>Dear Pericles.. I will not and need not comment on your 'inquisition'.<<

Did you or did you not start a thread recently on the topic of Ethics?

It is hardly surprising, then, that your credibility here is so low.
Posted by Pericles, Sunday, 30 January 2011 9:25:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Shintaro :) not bad.. but please... look at the facts.

Dear Pericles.. you are a master of devising wild fantasies in your own mind and then.. satisfied you are absolutely right.. projecting those fantasies on others with a superior attitude. And you speak to me of ethics ?

HOMEWORK... All should be able to comment intelligently on the impact of the theories of Wilhelm Reich on the nature of American (and Australian) politic strategies.

For this, you will need a working knowledge of

a) Bernays construction of the 'Ideal Consumer'
b) 60s leftist rebellion against Bernays 'consumer' model
c) The embracing of Reich's ideas at the same time.
d) The impact of the Eselon institute and EST training.
e) The reaction of Capitalists/Manufacturers to c an d.

Having reached that working knowledge, the participant will then be in a position to unpack why Labor policies don't seem quite 'labor' to staunch traditional laborites and Liberal policies don't seem quite 'liberal' to staunch traditional liberals.
It will also explain why the Greens seem to give the 2 fingered salute to just about everyone... but they do know who they are aiming at...
Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Sunday, 30 January 2011 4:18:02 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy