The Forum > General Discussion > What is it we are not getting?
What is it we are not getting?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
-
- All
Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 21 January 2011 7:48:02 PM
| |
As far as I can see we have about 80 posts on the topic of AGW, and there have been no scientific link wars.
Is this a first? Posted by spindoc, Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:44:18 AM
| |
spindoc:
It's rather refreshing don't you think? Who wants wars anyway? However I did come across two links - just for interest's sake: http://www.austrade.gov.au/Stern-warning-to-the-world/default.aspx "Stern Warning to the World," by Tim Harcourt. And: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=9115 "Appealing to science in the AGW debate is delusional," by John Tons, 2 July 2009. Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 22 January 2011 4:16:36 PM
| |
Joe:
Your wife sounds like an incredible lady and I'm sorry that she had to put up with a bully. Unfortunately, it's often the norm. The wrong people with blinkered vision are often in charge. I suspect, because they're not a threat to anyone. Very few stand up to them however - I did to one of mine and frankly lived to regret it. I should have simply (and quietly) left. All that happened was that I couldn't ever give that place of emplyment as a reference, and lost about eight years of my life. But I learned a lesson, ( to keep my mouth shut) so I guess that counts for something. Yes, I like Schopenhauer as well. As you can tell. Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 22 January 2011 4:26:05 PM
| |
Thanks Lexi, yes, she certainly was. I was incredibly lucky.
Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 22 January 2011 6:17:56 PM
| |
Are you all finished?
BLUE Posted by Deep-Blue, Sunday, 23 January 2011 11:43:48 PM
|
Schopenhauer was one of the greatest, he would have been on our side :)
Joe