The Forum > General Discussion > Lets hear it for old Joh.
Lets hear it for old Joh.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Spooky, eh what, with the flood peak of what, if Antiseptic is right, was a one-in-a-hundred-year rain event similar to that of 1893, being a metre lower than that resulting from the significantly smaller rain event of 1974, occurring one hundred years to the day later. Due largely, it seems, to the Wivenhoe Dam his one-man-band government pushed through working to some extent exactly as his departmental hydrological and engineering advice had said it would.
I feel it necessary to clarify the last sentence of my first post to this thread.
I wasn't meaning to imply that those charged with the operation of the Wivenhoe Dam in the present day did anything other than the best that was possible in managing its discharge in the circumstances that currently exist. Those circumstances are ones in which, due to the ill-advised 1990 cancellation of the Wolfdene Dam storage component of the overall Brisbane water supply and flood mitigation capability, the operators of the Wivenhoe Dam were effectively not free to release water because the government was counting on that water for Brisbane's supply.
Not only did the Goss government elected in 1989 immediately cancel the Wolfdene Dam part of this visionary project, but they fired the top two government hydrologists as well! It was these decisions that robbed the Wivenhoe Dam operators of the ability to be better prepared for flood mitigation in 2011.
The Lord Mayor of Brisbane has, understandably, called for an inquiry into the SEQ flood disaster. See: http://bit.ly/ijsUY3 , which said, inter alia:
"Senior engineering and hydrological sources,
not authorised to comment on the record, told
The Australian that investigations need to be
conducted into the operations of Wivenhoe Dam,
which had been forced to release massive
volumes of water to reduce the risk of a
catastrophic collapse."
How much even lower may this flood have been if Joh's foresight had been acknowledged in 1989?
Or higher if Wivenhoe had collapsed?