Sorry I *don't see how it is wrong in gods eyes

Nicnoto,
Careful using the name of god you will invoke the god squad and any hope of a rational discussion will be lost.
Anything is ok so long as it is between two consenting adults and does not hurt any other person. There are a few exceptions to the rule like the logic that tell's you murder is not OK even if the vicim agrees.
You do not have to like it personally to tollerate it, just because you don't agree with something does not mean it must be destroyed.

Nicnoto, you seem to be a little jumbled with what you do and do not find acceptable:

**I disagree with stereotypical "queens" and the homosexual tarts and (excuse my language) sluts of society, as much as I disagree with man-whores and women of the sort.**

Why Nicnoto, do you disagree with people being the labels you have given to them. It's nobody's business really is it? and especially if they are not hurting anyone. It's a bit double standards I think.

Runner, you said **Certain body parts were never designed to go in the passage where we excrete waste.**

Oh really? Do you know anything about male sexual anatomy?

dotto,
what a load of crap ! :-)

Dear Nicnoto,

Richard Dawkins in his book, "The God Delusion,"
gives his own amended Ten Commandments. Amongst
them he says:

"Enjoy your own sex life (so long as it damages
nobody else) and leave others to enjoy theirs
in private whatever their inclinations, which
are none of your business."

In today's society you apparently can't get away
with saying, "If you try to stop me from insulting
homosexuals it violates my freedom of prejudice."

But you can get away with saying, "It violates my
freedom of religion." What's the difference?
Yet again, religion trumps all!

Dawkins tell us that:

"The thing you notice about religious people is their
wonderful Christian charity. What kind of an electorate
could, term after term, vote in a man of such ill-informed
bigotry as Senator Jesse Helms, Republican of North
Carolina? A man who has sneered, "The New York Times,"
and the "Washington Post," are both infested with
homosexuals themselves. Just about every person down
there is a homosexual or lesbian..."

Imagine that.

I guess the answer to that question is, I suppose, as
Dawkins points out, "the kind of electorate that sees
morality in narrowly religious terms and feels
threatened by anybody who doesn't share the same
absolutist faith."

Attitudes to homosexuality reveal much about the sort of
morality that is inspired by religious faith.

Nicnoto, welcome to OLO.

I don’t feel inclined to get embroiled in the nitty-gritty of this age-old debate. Suffice to say that I entirely agree with you.

Cheers.