But Rache..(continued)..

I've noticed some very weird events going on in the USA of late...which some adventurous people might call a 'conspiracy' :) others would call it base corruption.

1/ George Soros.... recently ramped UP his share holdings in PetroBras (Brazilian oil producer) to around $900,000,000 (his biggest holding)

2/ Obama's gang just promised/loaned $2,000,000,000 yep..billions, to that same company to do the very thing he has just banned in the USA.
"Deep water off shore oil exploration" (BP's troubled well was 5000 feet deep.. Brazils is 14,000 feet)

3/ SOROS founded the "Centre for American Progress"

4/ The CAP formulated:

a) Obama's Transition team.
b) Obama's policies.

http://www.americanprogress.org/experts/PodestaJohn.html (3rd Paragraph)

//Most recently, Podesta served as co-chair of President Obama’s transition, where he coordinated the priorities of the incoming administration’s agenda, oversaw the development of its policies, and spearheaded its appointments of major cabinet secretaries and political appointees.//

I outline this more fully in another discussion.
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=3741#91096

Oil disaster in Florda, Obama Bans drilling, who wins? :) hmm could it be.. Petrobras and it's major shareholder Soros?(and his Democrat connections)

My own assessment of it all..whether UK or USA or Australia, is that 'capitalists' masquerading as 'socialists or Greens' are all Watermelons who plan to stay or become much much more powerful over time.

WE DO have a voice though. They can try to baffle us with BS, but we can still vote.

ELECTIONS COMING UP :)....

For me the answer is strategic voting. (and as many as I can persuade of it's value)

Small parties without HUGE vested financial interests are more likely to have a genuine agenda... think *balance of power*

Without wanting to sound mean.. I'm an enemy of the Greens, but not all of their policies..just the ones which dovetail with the scenario above.*DANGER-BEWARE*

DLP ? hasbeens.
One Nation? Past use-by
Demo...who?
Family First ? yep..thats' my choice.

You are rambling, Boaz.

In this your most recent incarnation, it appears that you are using OLO as an outlet for your daily, unabridged and unedited, stream-of-consciousness.

I suspect you may have too much spare time on your hands.

>>Actually.. the article showed [the secret social engineering plot] was not a secret any more. They planned the dilution.. "Forced Multiculturalism"... from a Labour insider.<<

One disaffected Labour swallow doesn't make a conspiratorial summer, Boaz.

But from this rather thin gruel, you fashion a confection of rich complexity, like a Masterchef bouillabaisse.

>>But I believe there is more too it. *This* is where I get a bit speculative about 'conspiracies' :) As to whether people get together and actually plan this ? I dunno.. the usual suspects are -Bilderburgers -Rothschilds -Illuminati -Council on Foreign Relations. -Fabian socialists -Freemasons. -Jooooos.<<

Speculative is good.

Arm-wavingly loopy also fits.

Pericles.. you are turning into a serial 'annoyer' :)

One dissafected labour swallow ? Make what you wish of the reports... it's all good.
Here's something to show how equal opportunity is alive and well in good ol England....(but not forever)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY5_Pfg1S1Y

Gee... now that was in Downing street. Hmmm.. I wonder how it would go over if such a thing were to occurr in Spring street or Canberra at Parliament house.

But..hey. as you said.. One disaffected labor swallow(or a few scruffy and loud Muslims) ... etc.

I suppose one Profit hungry "kindly old man" who's foundation virtually picked the team and wrote the gameplay is nothing but a 'mere swallow' :)

Perilous..I keep telling you.. people do read this stuff.

Have a nice arvo anyway..you deserve it. You do keep me on my toes.

OH.. here is another tidbit.. *throws*....plonk. http://www.englishdefenceleague.org/

Periwinkle... I'm just catching up with recent UK events. :) my the BNP have been very busy.. it looks like they must have donned "Islamic" garb and impersonated a bunch of "Islamist thugs" at (guess where? :)....

Why Barking of course.. and they must have done this just to cause "pro bnp paranoia among the residents"

What else could explain this behavior ? *waves*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGr4DVD4buI&feature=related

I'm glad that my contributions are so appreciated.

>>Pericles.. you are turning into a serial 'annoyer'... Have a nice arvo anyway..you deserve it. You do keep me on my toes.<<

But really, you're on a hiding to nothing on this topic, I'm afraid

You know so little of UK politics, that you think a demonstration by forty Islamic youths in Barking is a significant event. And that the presence at the same rally of a hundred or so junior fascists is somehow indicative of fundamental unrest.

The problem is, you have no understanding of the word "fringe", when it applies to radical elements of a political movement. This would be because such things don't happen in the Melbourne suburbs, and therefore take on a highly magnified importance in your mind when they happen half a world away.

Your fascination with such topics does you great credit, of course. Eventually, if you studied it for long enough - and maybe even took a trip over there to get a first-hand impression - you will understand it all a little more.

The UK has always had its protest industry. Back in the sixties, characters like Tariq Ali and Colin Jordan represented the two political bookends. They were noisy, colourful, but fundamentally harmless, because they did not represent any form of mainstream view. And as a result, life somehow still managed to creak along

If you are serious about researching fascism in the UK, I suggest you start your studies with Colin Jordan, who came to prominence in the late fifties onwards. It would help to read Oswald Mosley's autobiography "My Life" as well.

Some more pointers for you:

http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/neonazi_parties.html

If you are able to find the time, you will discover that these current scuffles have had a long history in the UK. They are part of the political and social furniture. Probably, they form an essential safety-valve for dissent, which is what a tolerant and inclusive society is all about, n'est-ce pas?

They are only remarkable because they contrast so vividly with the she'll-be-right apathy we find in our ultra-suburban Aussie backwater.