The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Human Rights and Equal Opportunity....again.

Human Rights and Equal Opportunity....again.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
I'm beginning to worry about you Boaz. Your political trajectory has taken a distinct lurch towards open Fascism since your latest reincarnation.

Mind you, it has its upside. You keep introducing the thread to the yucky dregs of the Internet, that you carefully scrape from your shoe for our amusement.

You must have searched rooly, rooly hard to discover http://racetraitor.org.

It hasn't been updated for many years, for one thing.

Mind you, that's hardly surprising, 'cos nothing that it says makes a lick of sense.

Here's a typical sample:

"For us, being white is not a skin color but a state of mind, and accepting the privileges of whiteness. We think that if you fight as hard as you can against those privileges, even to the point of risking your own ability to receive them, then you are on your way to becoming unwhite."

(Incidentally, I did spot a letter of support from the Australian Greens while I was browsing the site. Now we are all totally confused...)

But seriously, parading excerpts from the BNP web site is showing your colours just a little too much, I fear. Especially an article such as the one you pointed out, which is based on a premise so weak that it is laughable.

"A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “White” produces 0 results"

Of course, it never occurred to you - or to the BNP - to explain that there might actually be no causes or charities that specifically pertain to "whites".

This may be for a number of reasons. Apathy, perhaps. Or simply laziness.

Or - just perhaps - there isn't any need for a charity devoted to providing services along the lines of the "White Justice Project".

Possibly because - just perhaps - "whites" have already got all the justice they can handle?

BNP are just rabble-rousers, Boaz. England has a long history of them. They are practically part of the furniture. It might simply be down to the miserable weather, a way to keep warm.

But they are most definitely not to be taken seriously.
Posted by Pericles, Friday, 18 June 2010 1:35:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Another aspect, that of course the BNP does not highlight, just in case it interferes with their sneer campaign, is that the UK National Lottery has to date disbursed £24 billion to various projects and charities.

"Good Causes", they call them.

http://www.national-lottery.co.uk/player/p/goodcausesandwinners/wherethemoneygoes.ftl

Which puts their list of donations to various entities with labels that include words such as "Muslim" and "African" - that they intended to be seen as utterly scandalous (shock, horror!) - into some perspective.

Add up all the donations you see there, Boaz, then calculate it as a percentage of the "Good Causes".

I know you won't care to do the sum, so I'll do it for you.

0.4%

Shock! Horror!
Posted by Pericles, Friday, 18 June 2010 1:51:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I've just spent ... well, allocated ... the morning to reading up on "freedom of speech" in Australia. Turns out, it was only a two coffee read. Isn't any, excluding regarding politics. Coincidence?.

Sorry, bit off topic. Carry on...
Posted by StG, Friday, 18 June 2010 2:21:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Pericles.. thank you for your perspective..except the bit about me *lurching toward fascism*...that was of the standard of the now totally discredited "Islamophobia/fear hate loathing" rubbish you always trot out after lifting not a single keystroke to verify information provided.. quite contrary to the IMMENSE amount of discovery and research you did to debunk the BNP claim...

Care to indicate your deep deep reasons for this passion against 'fascism' but your complete apathy towards the darker aspects of Islam ?

When it comes to 'where the money goes' you need to dig a lot deeper than just the web site 'broad statements'... you need to examine the political networks which administer them.
If you look closely at where..and the demographics.. the voting trends.. etc.. it might reveal a slightly different piccy than the one your sand trowel managed to uncover.

Your quaint idea that the absense of any 'whites' this or that charities or projects is not an indication of apathy but of ABSENSE of any idea of white supremacism or priority.

http://www.lottery.culture.gov.uk/results.asp

The fact that the lists of funding for specifically racist or race/religion based groups is an indication of their narrow race and/or religion based focus when it should be NATIONAL rather than racial. In saying this we are back to my old mantra "citizenship" not multiculturalism.

The RACE TRAITOR site has not been updated ? HAH! youuuu bet 'it' has.. but not that specific one... see the local version...

http://www.acrawsa.org.au/

"Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association"

Ignatiev's thinking has spawned lots of mini 'race traitor' groups and that's one of them.

PS...I'll support the BNP until the bigger parties wake up.. as the Liberals did with Hanson. She served a purpose.
Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Friday, 18 June 2010 7:36:34 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi STG... sorry to clutter the thread with 'Pericles Management' housekeeping.

Freedom of speech.. try us on your results?

I am going to make a rather broad assertion now.. (with capitals..sorry)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS... are a marxist socialist overlay of discrimation and oppression against majorities (mainly whites)!

Here's how I got there.

Numerous valid complaints are made to Human Rights commissions..which are rejected on purely 'subjective' grounds.. ie.. picking and choosing those which support minorities and rejecting any which might support majorities, the traditional population.

One has to ask.. "why is this so?"

I'd love to hear peoples thoughts on that.

EVIDENCE. Apart from my own experience which I won't detail here. Canada is the best example of where it all goes haywire.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/02/canada-non-muslims-human-rights-complaint-against-the-quran-dismissed.html

The key words in that re this topic are:

//But B.C. Human Rights Tribunal member Barbara Humphreys says Simpson didn't explain how the Koran, the central religious text of Islam that has existed for more than 1,300 years, had a negative impact on him.
Humphreys dismissed the case after ruling that Simpson's complaint would not further the purposes of the Human Rights Code.//

HUH ? "the purposes" ? errr...I thought they were to protect people from ill treatment..discrimination,..hate speech and so on.. "impartially".

It doesn't matter if it's "islam/Muslims"... what matters is the underlying 'intent' of these star chambers.

These commissions of inquisition are the closest thing to true fascism we have today.
Global Governance is at the top of their agenda. Their legal people are constantly undermining Australian sovereignty making submissions to that effect.. trying to overturn Australian law in favour of International Human Rights law.
Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Friday, 18 June 2010 8:35:05 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Al
No group deserves to be discriminated against but at some point in our lives we all do experience some form of prejudice.

You asked: "ie.. picking and choosing those which support minorities and rejecting any which might support majorities, the traditional population. One has to ask.. "why is this so?"

It might have something to do with the fact they are the minority and hence have less protections, solidity and position in the community than the majorities or traditional populations as you put it.

Remember the old joke about democracy - three foxes and a rabbit discussing and voting for what they have for dinner.

Who will look after the rabbit's interests.

Al, I am not condoning loose legislation on this, there has to be a balance between freedoms, rights and protections that can support the 'commonsense' approach while addressing the concerns you raise.
Posted by pelican, Friday, 18 June 2010 8:44:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy