Ok, let's go through it all again, with the benefit of your additional input, Arjay.

>>we see Larry actually use his hands to mimic the collapse of the building,so here is the incontravertable proof that Larry meant the controlled demolition of WTC 7... Have a real close look at those Silverstein hands Pericles.They were not waving about but descended in unison just like WTC 7.<<

So, someone waving their hands, descending in unison "just like WTC7" is incontrovertible proof that the building was demolished.

Presumably, Larry also hired those guys to fly passenger planes full of people into the other two buildings, so that exploding his own building would go unnoticed.

Yep, well up to your usual standard, Arjay.

>>You and these other clowns are really pathetic... This clown should in court charged with being an accomplist to terrorism.<<

And you call *us* clowns?

Epic.

Pericles ,you are distorting the reality.Larry changed his story saying he meant to pull the firemen out.Now the facts reveal his real intent of having WTC7 demolished by explosives.Larry has been reported ringing his insurance company that day seeking permission to "pull it".Now Larry thought is was logistically possible for a building to be wired for demolition in a few hours.WTC 7 as Larry knew was already wired for demolition and it would be on the media.So the ruse would be to say we needed to demo it that afternoon for safety reasons.He was caught out a beauty.

It takes weeks to wire a building that is not on fire for a controlled demolition.When Larry realised this,he tried to change his story and thus has been caught out.

He was not the master mind of this plot,he came along for the ride to make money.Thus he is complicit in this crime and should be charged.

Arjay, I'm not entirely sure that you know what you are saying here. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for a moment, but you really ought to take a deep breath and think it through again.

Are you seriously suggesting that, if the planes hitting the twin towers had not happened, WTC7 would have been demolished anyway, for the insurance money?

Is that what you are saying?

You refuse to listen pericles.WTC 7 was supposed to come down in the dust and rubble of the towers.Something went wrong and it's demo was delayed for 6 hrs.Perhaps another plane was destined to hit it.Was is flight 93 or some other flight that never got off the ground?

The opinions of people like Prof Steven Jones and Dr Frank Legge is that WTC 7 was supposed to fall under the dust cloud of the towers and thus with no video footage,would remain a mystery.

Dr Frank Legge "Journal of 911 Studies" has done an extensive study of the Pentagon attack,and he does not discount the possibility of it being a plane when many blame this on a missile attack.Flight 93 it seems, was shot out of the sky.

Really in depth studies only began a few yrs ago and that is why the evidence is so slow in surfacing.

No, seriously.

>>WTC 7 was supposed to come down in the dust and rubble of the towers.<<

Ok. So remind me, who set the explosives in the first place? Silverstein?

>>Something went wrong and it's demo was delayed for 6 hrs.Perhaps another plane was destined to hit it.Was is flight 93 or some other flight that never got off the ground?<<

Right. So it was in fact co-ordinated with the planes flying into the twin towers, is that what you are saying?

>>WTC 7 was supposed to fall under the dust cloud of the towers and thus with no video footage,would remain a mystery.<<

That means, if I understand you correctly, that Silverstein had prior knowledge of the attack.

>>Flight 93 it seems, was shot out of the sky<<

So, all those stories about the bravery of the passengers in resisting the terrorists and forcing them to change course, were - how shall we say... inaccurate?

Let me see if I can summarize your thoughts here.

Larry Silverstein hired suicide pilots to fly planes into New York buildings, so that he could surreptitiously blow up one of his own buildings, in order to collect the insurance money. Some aspects of the plan didn't go according to the script, so he had to make a decision to explode the devices, which he had set some time previously without anyone noticing, anyway.

That is your theory? For today, at least.

And your only evidence, for all of this, is someone waving his hands about on TV.

Arjay, I hope one day soon you will realize not only how ridiculous your "theories" are, but how unbelievably hurtful they must be to the survivors, and their relatives. Not to mention how they insult the intelligence of the rest of the world.

I did not say that Silverstein hired anyone.You are mis-representing what I've said.Silverstein like many others knew since they made a fortune on the stock market having prior knowledge.

You have not come near disproving any of my other points either,so my assumption is that you have another agenda which bests serves your interests.