The Forum > General Discussion > Child Sex Abuse and the Catholic Church
Child Sex Abuse and the Catholic Church
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 45
- 46
- 47
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
It is right to be upset over the current revelations of historical child sexual abuse by priests all over the world, and the failure by their superiors. Paedophiles weren't exactly overrepresented in the priesthood and the Bishop's response was normal at that time in history. However, as you rightly note priests are charged with a duty to be moral shepherds. The priests involved were wolves and the Bishops were asleep on the watch. At one time the exposure was a needed wake up call for the Church even if it seems to have developed into a sport.
However I suspect Fr Doyle is being a little disingenous (to advance his own belief that the hierarchy needs scrapping so that his own beliefs can triumph within the Church). He should know how much work the Catholic Church has done to address the problem of sexual abuse. An indication of this can be found here:
http://catholicanchor.org/wordpress/?p=601
Or by reading the Collins book that Foxy had me buy and I misplaced (title?).
I don't believe celibacy causes paedophilia. Doesn't it mainly occur within families? I also subscribe to the view that at one time paedophiles were attracted to the Catholic priesthood as it gave great cover. Now they would go to greener pastures. On that note the continual digging up of priestly misbehaviour and Bishop's poor handling decades ago now creates a perception that Catholic priests have a monopoly on paedophilia and risks the greener pastures, wherever they may be might be now, will be hidden for the next 50 years.
Abusers should be put in jail but the confidentiality of the confessional does serve a purpose. Granted it can be abused but who would confess if it wasn't confidential? It is like arguing that more criminal offenders would be caught if lawyers were obliged to rat on their clients. That is true but it would compromise the system.
Surely it would be a non-issue these days as a victim of a Catholic priest would assume that secular authorities would believe them cf. the situation if anyone else was the abuser.